

Orgiginally i wanted to create a wasp that had several guns
attached to it like some kind of vietnam huey wasp. I beleive
I should link to the source pic of the wasp as the original
phtographer of the wasp would allow me to use the picture
if I didnt resize or change it in any way prvoded there was a link.
So I had to put the wasp in my completed picture before resize.
thus I resized the picture I was making. proof if it was needed
that Im a total cunt. distorting the meaning of the rules set down.
However I'm not so bad as to use this source without
supplying the required link and dobbing myself in at the same
time.
ladies and gentlemen, for your veiwing pleasure, please welcome,
your friend and mine; the original wasp4260 (Polistes gallicus).
All the way from NaturePhoto-CZ and boy his arms are tired.
www.naturephoto-cz.com/wasp:polistes-gallicus-photo-4260.html
I would advise anyone not to read my posts possibly gloss over it
or use the ignore button. I'm not here for fame and fortune.

my total confusion comes from the fact that it would be really easy to get another picture of a wasp that didn't have such ludicrous conditions attached.
I admire your perseverence but question its appropriateness :)
( ,
Sat 18 Oct 2008, 15:40,
archived)
I admire your perseverence but question its appropriateness :)

Although I'm confused as to why someone would put an unwatermarked picture on the internet and impose restrictions on it afterwards.
*spam* www.amiatwat.com *spam*
( ,
Sat 18 Oct 2008, 15:45,
archived)
*spam* www.amiatwat.com *spam*