
but not back it up and then claim you want everyone to get along?
Fuck off back to the Daily Mail.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:17,
archived)
Fuck off back to the Daily Mail.

What do you want me to prove then?
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:20,
archived)

that 'England is officially/legally a Christian country'
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:22,
archived)

Tell me what you see.
Fine, England doesn't have as high a percentage of Christians (or if you really prefer - C of E) as it used to. It does, however, according to the latest census, still have a very high amount that still affiliate themselves with it.
www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/commentaries/ethnicity.asp
That shows you current statistics, which I'm sure you would agree, is still quite high.
There is little doubt, though if you really want, it is provable, that England's laws are based around (original) Christian beliefs.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:30,
archived)
Fine, England doesn't have as high a percentage of Christians (or if you really prefer - C of E) as it used to. It does, however, according to the latest census, still have a very high amount that still affiliate themselves with it.
www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/commentaries/ethnicity.asp
That shows you current statistics, which I'm sure you would agree, is still quite high.
There is little doubt, though if you really want, it is provable, that England's laws are based around (original) Christian beliefs.

High(ish) CoE membership does NOT make for an officially or legally Christian country. Try again.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:31,
archived)

instead of actually getting what I was saying?
In at least my eyes, ~71% of the population makes that country a Christian country.
That and the monarch being Christian, and she is (theoretically at least) the law setter (though she does so through her parliament).
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:35,
archived)
In at least my eyes, ~71% of the population makes that country a Christian country.
That and the monarch being Christian, and she is (theoretically at least) the law setter (though she does so through her parliament).

because y'see, the world doesn't opperate via your eyes. Also, the queen is not the 'law setter' and has not been since the deposition of Charles I. Also, once again, you are trying to modify your stance. And again, we come to the argument that the term 'Christian' is basically meaningless as one sect of 'Christians' does not follow the ideals of the other. As I said, the largest religion accounts for at best 22% of the nation.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:37,
archived)

*Hugs anyway*
Opinions! Who'd have 'em.
I don't know why I get like that at times. I'm just sick of both sides having to shove opposing opinions in their faces.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:47,
archived)
Opinions! Who'd have 'em.
I don't know why I get like that at times. I'm just sick of both sides having to shove opposing opinions in their faces.

Just how ill educated are you? I see the red cross. This was the standard brought over from the arms of Geoffrey of Aquitaine when he came to England to be monarch. It is not a religios symbol despite the fact that it later appeared on the arms of England's catholic murderers when they went to the middle east on their 'crusades' ( which was actually a land grab for the second sons of minor nobles who were having a hard time being anything under the laws of succession of the day. A fact many choose to overlook ).
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:40,
archived)

I think people realised it was a generally a really shit idea to go around killing people long before Jesus did or didn't roam the earth. Therefore i would suggest that what you call Christian Beliefs were based around common laws that have been around since we evolved into sentients beings (some of us are still undergoing the change).
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:52,
archived)

That's obviously the first thing you think of though when you think of laws.
Take for example:
It was illegal to be Gay until fairly recently.
It was illegal to have sex outside of marriage.
It is illegal to have multiple wives.
Mainly, they seem revolve around sex, which is interesting.
There's many that were likely to not have been around prior to Jesus' possible existence.
( ,
Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:56,
archived)
Take for example:
It was illegal to be Gay until fairly recently.
It was illegal to have sex outside of marriage.
It is illegal to have multiple wives.
Mainly, they seem revolve around sex, which is interesting.
There's many that were likely to not have been around prior to Jesus' possible existence.