I wasn't shoutingI was writing in the style of Dawkin's book covers.
I'm not an oxford professor, but I am a scientist and academic, and I value opinion backed up by empirical data, rather than simply opinion. I know he refers to some studies that support his arguments, but he rarely cites them, just speaks in very general terms, which I don't think lends any credibility to his arguments, even though I agree with a lot of his opinions.
(I'm not an oxford professor, but I am a scientist and academic, and I value opinion backed up by empirical data, rather than simply opinion. I know he refers to some studies that support his arguments, but he rarely cites them, just speaks in very general terms, which I don't think lends any credibility to his arguments, even though I agree with a lot of his opinions.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 28 Nov 2008, 12:22,
archived)
Ok,I am a strong supporter of his work and ideas and feel he backs them up very accuratley when asked. (he rarely gets the chance) I think he also has to speak in general terms, as many people have 'blind' faith that clouds thier own judgement.
We should agree to disagree i think.
(We should agree to disagree i think.
PointlessCamel Last one on drugs is a queer.,
Fri 28 Nov 2008, 12:32,
archived)