Actually I was incorrect just the once, that just makes you a poor judge.Sometimes it's easy to confuse people absence with they being off licking their wounds.
(
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:25,
archived)
noyou are simply prone to being wrong more often that you realise
i win
(,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:30,
archived)
i win
Yes. Erm obviously.There's no reasoning with someone without reason.
( riverghost servicing your mum since,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 16:13,
archived)
That'san ambiguous sentence.
You would have been better to type, "There is no reasoning with someone who is unable to reason."
As it stands, you leave open the possibility that reason itself is the thing that you are stating must be present (rather than merely the ability to reason on the part of he with whom you are arguing).
3/10. Must troll harder.
(,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 16:24,
archived)
You would have been better to type, "There is no reasoning with someone who is unable to reason."
As it stands, you leave open the possibility that reason itself is the thing that you are stating must be present (rather than merely the ability to reason on the part of he with whom you are arguing).
3/10. Must troll harder.