I'm not saying tomato with fish genes is wrong - I'm citing it as an example of GM, to illustrate the cross-pollination aspect.
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:22,
archived)
I'm saying it is wrong thoughbecause you are using an example of a thing that did not quite happen in the manner that you report it to support an argument that is based solely on your opinion and resistance to progress.
"Tomatoes with anti-freeze proteins already present in the food being switched on after studying how the same proteins work in Arctic flounder" Does not really have the same shock effect does it?
("Tomatoes with anti-freeze proteins already present in the food being switched on after studying how the same proteins work in Arctic flounder" Does not really have the same shock effect does it?
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:25,
archived)
OK - I'm sorry.Here you go then: "Untested GM stuff shouldn't be allowed into the cycle."
Is that better?
(Is that better?
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:33,
archived)
It puts us back to the beginningas I don't know what you mean by untested.
As I said, The world health organisation monitors this. The national authorities are required to carry out thorough risk assessments for human and environmental health risks so assuming that's what you mean then I agree with you but considering that's the way it is now I don't see what you are wanting to change.
(As I said, The world health organisation monitors this. The national authorities are required to carry out thorough risk assessments for human and environmental health risks so assuming that's what you mean then I agree with you but considering that's the way it is now I don't see what you are wanting to change.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:37,
archived)