Given he's thirteen, and a childhis identity being on the news rather shocked me, plus her's; aren't kids protected by law if they fuck up and murder someone, but not apparently create someone? My sense of the law is somewhat hazy
(
Jahled Three shades of black,
Fri 13 Feb 2009, 23:13,
archived)
Not when they, and their parents, not only consent to them being on TVbut actually reported it to the news in the first place. Do you think that BBC news has some kind of police scanner that tells them when a child with teen parents is being born? They interviewed the kids in the hostpital, at the mother's bedside. What does that tell you?
(,
Fri 13 Feb 2009, 23:18,
archived)
Technically, this is all the sexual abuse of two children if you think about, at least from an ignorance leveland now there is a third in the equation, neither is going to bring up with any initial competence or financial security; and they certainly can't fall back on any grand parents who are obviously complete fucking twats for allowing this situation in the first place, or developing so far; for reassurance
I just find it curious if a teenager thrusts a knife through someone's heart and kills someone before the age of sixteen they can't be identified for legal means, as if 'to protect their innocence'
Somewhat ironic
(I just find it curious if a teenager thrusts a knife through someone's heart and kills someone before the age of sixteen they can't be identified for legal means, as if 'to protect their innocence'
Somewhat ironic
Jahled Three shades of black,
Fri 13 Feb 2009, 23:30,
archived)