Yes I would.Equality is another horrible illusion. I'm all for advancement based on utilitarian merit, not on some arbitrary government declaration.
Eg. If some total tard gets a job instead of me, because targets for racial equality need to be met, I would consider that to be a disgrace.
Free health care I'm not fussed either way about. Ultimately, its probably a lot more efficient for health to operate in the private sector, but I respect the utilitarian arguments in favour of public health, as the health of a countries economy is directly linked to the health of its populous.
(,
Tue 7 Apr 2009, 17:22,
archived)
Eg. If some total tard gets a job instead of me, because targets for racial equality need to be met, I would consider that to be a disgrace.
Free health care I'm not fussed either way about. Ultimately, its probably a lot more efficient for health to operate in the private sector, but I respect the utilitarian arguments in favour of public health, as the health of a countries economy is directly linked to the health of its populous.
I said equality, not positive discrimination.But the government does sometimes get confused between the two.
I am a little confused as to why you're arguing for the stagnation of mankind.
(I am a little confused as to why you're arguing for the stagnation of mankind.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 7 Apr 2009, 17:26,
archived)