The concept of genetic clones versus (let's call them experience/choice clones for the sake of this) experience/choice clones is just freudian versus jungian all over again.
It's impossible to create perfect clones because there will never be two genetically identical humans who have experienced the exact same choices and events.
Why does it happen? That's pretty much the same question any discussion boils down to.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 8:16,
archived)
It's impossible to create perfect clones because there will never be two genetically identical humans who have experienced the exact same choices and events.
Why does it happen? That's pretty much the same question any discussion boils down to.
These days I'm a non-practising quaker.
One day soon I might tell the story.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 8:23,
archived)
One day soon I might tell the story.
When a river happens to meander in one direction rather than another, from a multiverse perspective, both things have happened, producing a nice symmetrical tree-like structure of possibilities over time. When, due to the random action of something, such as rats, a lift loses power and ceases to function, that also has a perfectly reasonable position in the multiverse as one branch on an elegant tree. However, from my point of view, I may find myself stuck in the now broken lift, perhaps with somebody I hate. Yet I know that, in a parallel universe, there is another me who is not stuck. How is that in any way fair? Also, in what sense am I the one who is stuck in the lift, and not the one who isn't? It's all very well observing this retrospectively and saying that I'd better put up with it, but how did I get there? Why can't I have both experiences at once?
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 8:42,
archived)
Fuck them even if they do, there's no point in getting caught up with things you can't control.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 8:58,
archived)
if there was an equal chance of a big rock being in the way in a different place. Perhaps there wouldn't be, due to the rock having fallen off a cliff and probably falling in a particular direction, but overall, there would be an equal probability of the cliff being on the opposite side of the river. Or else there wouldn't be, and so on.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 9:08,
archived)
so if there's a 60/40 at the top then every 'branch' from there on is affected and there is less and less of a chance that a branch on the outside will eventually reach equilibrium.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 9:12,
archived)
If the very first chance that happens anywhere in time is an unequal chance, then, yes. The tree would be all bent.
(,
Mon 13 Apr 2009, 9:16,
archived)