isn't it 'rotationally symmetrical'?or have I just made that term up?
edit: ah - reassuring pissage!
editedit: woo to the pic!
(edit: ah - reassuring pissage!
editedit: woo to the pic!
enceladus,
Sat 2 May 2009, 20:28,
archived)
Home » Messageboard »
XXX » Message 9414938
(Thread)
isn't it 'rotationally symmetrical'?
enceladus,
Sat 2 May 2009, 20:28,
archived)
isn't it 'rotationally symmetrical'? enceladus,
Sat 2 May 2009, 20:28,
archived)