Why should he prove it?Proof doesn't seem to be important to these discussions that take up half the fucking board. As long as he has a paranoid suspicion and some dodgy youtube link, well, he can prove anything! Or do you not approve of someone using your own method?
As far as I can tell, you have one rule for yourself and call others stupid for not following something completely different. Your technique of convincing people is laughable to the point of pastiche, and your humour isn't funny. Cursing at people and spreading slander is not funny, nor is your hypocritical 'truth'.
I'm a lurker, but I'm getting so tired of this whole thing.
Grow up.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 16:20,
archived)
As far as I can tell, you have one rule for yourself and call others stupid for not following something completely different. Your technique of convincing people is laughable to the point of pastiche, and your humour isn't funny. Cursing at people and spreading slander is not funny, nor is your hypocritical 'truth'.
I'm a lurker, but I'm getting so tired of this whole thing.
Grow up.