The USA are the biggest bullies in the playground. We should tell them to stick their extradition case up their arse.
If he did something illegal while in the UK, prosecute him here.
Using anti-terror laws to extradite an idiot script kiddie is just plain wrong.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 21:57,
archived)
If he did something illegal while in the UK, prosecute him here.
Using anti-terror laws to extradite an idiot script kiddie is just plain wrong.
and in essence the crime was committed in the colonies as that’s where the action of looking at restriced materials happend.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:10,
archived)
the US. therefore the theft occurred there he merely looked at his ill-gotten gains at his house, the theft took place in the US.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:34,
archived)
and he has not deprived them of any data.
If you're going to spout off about the case, at least do some basic research into it.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:37,
archived)
If you're going to spout off about the case, at least do some basic research into it.
however what’s with your apparent hatred of america and the urge you feel to argue the toss with people in an attempt to make them she the world through your point of view? Well that’s my opinion of what you’re doing.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:42,
archived)
Besides, you posted your opinion first, presumably in "an attempt to make them see the world through your point of view", so it's fair game.
I like America and its people just fine (well most of them). It's the politicians, both there and here, that I have a problem with.
Still, if you want to continue to jump to erroneous conclusions by making false assumptions, be my guest.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:55,
archived)
I like America and its people just fine (well most of them). It's the politicians, both there and here, that I have a problem with.
Still, if you want to continue to jump to erroneous conclusions by making false assumptions, be my guest.
you are right expressing opinions are just fine however when they clash and there isn’t a lot of information available then one can only make assumptions. I do however agree with you about the politicians.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 23:02,
archived)
Mr. McKinnon left a message in one Pentagon computer making clear that his actions were politically motivated. In court, they represented the message as having said: “U.S. foreign policy is akin to government-sponsored terrorism. I will continue to disrupt at the highest possible level.”
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:50,
archived)
and then seams shocked when they take action?
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 22:54,
archived)
Not the smartest thing to do, but neither message makes him a terrorist.
If it did, there's an awful lot of b3tards, myself included, who should be expecting a knock on the door.
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 23:05,
archived)
If it did, there's an awful lot of b3tards, myself included, who should be expecting a knock on the door.
especially if its towards a military power, even more so when you have shown that you can inflict the damage/ disruption you promise
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 23:13,
archived)
it's the only way to be sure
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 23:20,
archived)
till we have more of the facts, i'll refer to this comment
www.b3ta.com/board/9616139
(,
Fri 31 Jul 2009, 23:17,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/9616139