no Kodak z8612bridge superzoom ,8mp, 35-432mm equiv. but only cost £120 so image quality sometimes suffers, and shot to shot time is crappy. Still good for the money, but eagerly awaiting the time i can afford a propper DSLR.
This one was shot at 116mm equiv with a few holes and the sky filled in at 36mm
(This one was shot at 116mm equiv with a few holes and the sky filled in at 36mm
wjh31,
Tue 29 Sep 2009, 22:38,
archived)
Oh right.I would have just zoomed in to cut the bottom off, is all.
300 pictures is a lot, though. I've never done more than ninety or so. Got any of them printed?
(300 pictures is a lot, though. I've never done more than ninety or so. Got any of them printed?
Ghostwriter can't pick up his pencil,
Tue 29 Sep 2009, 22:52,
archived)
I did have a couple of them printed in my old flatbut my printer is a bit naff, so not many of them.
Prolly shoulda zoomed in, but it adds a little context, and if the width/height ratio gets too large it can look a bit odd
(Prolly shoulda zoomed in, but it adds a little context, and if the width/height ratio gets too large it can look a bit odd
wjh31,
Tue 29 Sep 2009, 22:57,
archived)