Indeed theydo. And, to avoid falling foul of them, all one has to do is not looking at porn at work.
If b3ta is 'acceptable viewing' for the workplace in question, then it's not the employee's fault if someone posts something nsfw. If b3ta is not acceptable, then it's not acceptable porn or not.
If some tit posts you porn by mail, then it might arguable be your fault from opening mail from someone who has nothing to do with your work, or it might be their fault for mailing you porn... what is clear is that it probably isn't Outlook's (or GMail's, or whoever's) fault.
If my employer were wont to wield the sack hammer for the slightest hint of pr0n, I wouldn't look at b3ta at all... even when the compo is about 'fruit at war', some tosspot is bound to post tits.
Then again, I might look for a better employer.
(,
Thu 1 Oct 2009, 15:17,
archived)
If b3ta is 'acceptable viewing' for the workplace in question, then it's not the employee's fault if someone posts something nsfw. If b3ta is not acceptable, then it's not acceptable porn or not.
If some tit posts you porn by mail, then it might arguable be your fault from opening mail from someone who has nothing to do with your work, or it might be their fault for mailing you porn... what is clear is that it probably isn't Outlook's (or GMail's, or whoever's) fault.
If my employer were wont to wield the sack hammer for the slightest hint of pr0n, I wouldn't look at b3ta at all... even when the compo is about 'fruit at war', some tosspot is bound to post tits.
Then again, I might look for a better employer.