b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Reborn as Porn » Message 9719437

[challenge entry] ^_^

From the Reborn as Porn challenge. See all 562 entries (closed)

(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:11, archived)
# Oh Christ
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:12, archived)
# ^
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:13, archived)
# ^^
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:14, archived)
# Ah good
An image challenge that may get me fired before my pending redundancy, announced an hour ago.

*glums*
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:13, archived)
# ah what?
bastards
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:14, archived)
# mew. :(
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:26, archived)
# :C
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:14, archived)
# T_T
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:26, archived)
# Surely an image challenge...
...can't get you fired? Only transgressing your terms and conditions of employment can do that, shirly.
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:15, archived)
# Many terms and conditions of employment include don't look at pornography at work
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:16, archived)
# ooh beat me to it
although I can actually get away with viewing some pornography at work (part of my job, would you believe), I must choose the timing carefully as to ensure colleagues of a sensitive disposition are not within viewing distance.
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:19, archived)
# Indeed they
do. And, to avoid falling foul of them, all one has to do is not looking at porn at work.

If b3ta is 'acceptable viewing' for the workplace in question, then it's not the employee's fault if someone posts something nsfw. If b3ta is not acceptable, then it's not acceptable porn or not.

If some tit posts you porn by mail, then it might arguable be your fault from opening mail from someone who has nothing to do with your work, or it might be their fault for mailing you porn... what is clear is that it probably isn't Outlook's (or GMail's, or whoever's) fault.

If my employer were wont to wield the sack hammer for the slightest hint of pr0n, I wouldn't look at b3ta at all... even when the compo is about 'fruit at war', some tosspot is bound to post tits.

Then again, I might look for a better employer.
 
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 15:17, archived)
# oh, fuck no...
that's shit
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:18, archived)
# Aye.
Tis.
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:20, archived)
# and so it starts...
odd challenge for a site with a FAQ that says We like to keep b3ta free from any images which are, or could be mistaken as pornographic.
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:13, archived)
#
They may be wearing tight little shorts!
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:14, archived)
# O_O
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 14:15, archived)
# Ron Jeremy
Mentioned this one on the Frank Skinner show.

Clearly I would not know if it actually exists, and I'm not risking Googling it.
(, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 15:27, archived)