b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9739065 (Thread)

# Well, I always refer to my local Brights group as
'Saint Dawkins Worship.' Although plenty of the membership aren't that fond of him.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:34, archived)
# Dawkins/Hitchens have both objected to the use of the term 'brights'.
Just so you know.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:35, archived)
# Really? when?
He [edit: I mean Dawkins] used to be all for it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:40, archived)
# what the fuck are Brights?
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:41, archived)
#
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:45, archived)
# what a thoroughly pointless concept
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:46, archived)
# ^this
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:48, archived)
# Well, I liked it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:49, archived)
# Don't be discouraged,
At least you have the effort to attend gatherings of like-minded people who sound athiest to me, then I'm all for it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:05, archived)
# Oh, I'm not :)
I have to conceed that it sounds pretty cringy, at least at first. I suspect the whole "re-branding" thing might be more relavent in America, where they believe that atheists eat babies.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:14, archived)
# Remember both saying that it was a term
that implied superiority over the opposing party, which is never a good thing.

Mentioned here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=egILZ4ZQpPs
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:44, archived)
# Are you sure?
"We brights are not claiming to be bright (meaning clever, intelligent), any more than gays claim to be gay (meaning joyful, carefree)" Dawkins writing in Wired, 2003
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:48, archived)
# Yep, pretty sure he dropped the title for his book tour,
as Hitchens had persuaded him it sounded condescending.

Have you seen The Four Horsemen: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuyUz2XLp1E
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:58, archived)
# Yes, I have. Most enjoyable :)
Hitchens? Calling other people condescending? that's a bit ironic, isn't it? Still, I'm sure no-one wants to get into a Peoples-Front-of-Judea argument over semantics. Dawkins and the Brights movement still have a lot in common.

Reminds me that I still have Darwin's Dangerous Idea on my bookshelf and I still haven't read it! Must switch off computer and read more...
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:07, archived)
# I myself am a Hitchenist/Saganist
so I tend to give them a lot of slack where others wouldn't. No need to argue at all, we sound like we both know more than Fox News which is the most important thing. :)

Computers always get in the way of the bookshelf dammit! I must read Dawkins new one at some point.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:11, archived)
# I keep failing The Extended Phenotype.
Currently enjoying Ben Goldacre's Bad Science though - there's a book I can understand!

Right, I'm off out. Laters.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:21, archived)
# *googles brights*
ah, right, i'm with you now
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:42, archived)