b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9739036 (Thread)

# 7 Shape ... Prophet (like god speaks to him and stuff)


7-Shape Vector Richard Dawkins (T-shirt, Poster, Greeting Card Etc.)
-
If you want to be immortalised in this same way and be part of my project,
then just go to this page here. It tells you about the project and how you
can send me a picture and be vectored. Also you can suggest famous
people that you might want to see.

View All - My 7-Shape Faces Famous & B3tan
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:14, archived)
# That's very good.
Did anyone see his interview on the O'Reilly Factor recently? Funny.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:16, archived)
# recently?
i saw one about a year ago where cunty O'Reilly fails like he always does.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:22, archived)
# Is O'Reilly one of those strange shouty American TV people?
And why the hell didn't he call his show "Reilled up?"

Edit: Oh, I see he is. I don't think I can stand to watch that...

*watches anyway*
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:27, archived)
# yes
massive cunt Fox 'News' person.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:28, archived)
# He's the Brain to Glenn Beck's Pinky.

(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:34, archived)
# so, what are we gonna do tonight, brain?
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:39, archived)
# What, Again?



by the way - here is an article about my favorite cable talker
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/oct/09/rachel-maddow-television-talkshow
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:26, archived)
# I've watched that on youtube
but I preferred the Stephen Colbert interview it was funnier and less shouty and blind.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:27, archived)
# O'Reilly is teh king of tehs shouties
and Beck is king of the paranoids. And Fox News is Faux News.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:38, archived)
# that is ace
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:22, archived)
# Fantastic!
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:24, archived)
#
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:36, archived)
# hahaha
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:38, archived)
# I'll have to wait til I get home to see this.
www2.b3ta is blocked
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:50, archived)
# It's the Terminator 2 poster but with one of the Hitchens (I can never remember which is which) on the motorbike and HITCHENS instead of SCHWARZENEGGER at the top
It's nicely shopped and deserves a woo.

If there's any other b3ta images you'd like me to describe to you, just say.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:57, archived)
# I'll give it a woo then :D
I'll let you know next time I can't see one.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:59, archived)
# Please describe this picture.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:00, archived)
# 9738999 is a rather charming animation featuring Boris Johnson. He is winking and has a comedically large pipe which he is smoking. The substance inside the pipe is not clear, but there's a constant stream of dark grey smoke coming from it. Serene.
9738761 is a black and white image of a penguin with a small smiling mouth on its right cheek, high heels and large empty eyes. The penguin is holding both of its flippers to its face. Next to the penguin is a circle which we are led to believe is its egg. There is a some big black writing next to the peguin that says "I made potty but it was an egg". The handwriting is not exactly beautiful, but I had no problem reading it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:08, archived)
# amazingly well described sir
top marks
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:12, archived)
# Hahaha
I think I will click the Boris one on the basis of your beautiful description.
I think I have seen the penguin one before and I laughed.
If you could just keep this up for the next 20 minutes until I can go home I will be much obliged.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:12, archived)
# No problem, I'll invoice you by gaz within 7 working days
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:17, archived)
# I'll gaz you your cheque
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:19, archived)
# hehehe cheers guys
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:01, archived)
# Hahahahaha!
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:40, archived)
# Hahahhaha
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:42, archived)
# Haha. He wishes he was me.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:42, archived)
# Everyone wishes they were you.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:50, archived)
# DO WANT!
Aargh, I want far more of these than I can afford. Might be forced to buy a load of cards.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:24, archived)
# brilliant!
i love this bloke he is all of the ace! :D
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:30, archived)
# Very nice as always!
Let's start a religion around him. Dawkinsism, perhaps. That should annoy him.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:31, archived)
# Well, I always refer to my local Brights group as
"Saint Dawkins Worship." Although plenty of the membership aren't that fond of him.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:34, archived)
# Dawkins/Hitchens have both objected to the use of the term 'brights'.
Just so you know.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:35, archived)
# Really? when?
He [edit: I mean Dawkins] used to be all for it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:40, archived)
# what the fuck are Brights?
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:41, archived)
#
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:45, archived)
# what a thoroughly pointless concept
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:46, archived)
# ^this
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:48, archived)
# Well, I liked it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:49, archived)
# Don't be discouraged,
At least you have the effort to attend gatherings of like-minded people who sound athiest to me, then I'm all for it.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:05, archived)
# Oh, I'm not :)
I have to conceed that it sounds pretty cringy, at least at first. I suspect the whole "re-branding" thing might be more relavent in America, where they believe that atheists eat babies.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:14, archived)
# Remember both saying that it was a term
that implied superiority over the opposing party, which is never a good thing.

Mentioned here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=egILZ4ZQpPs
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:44, archived)
# Are you sure?
"We brights are not claiming to be bright (meaning clever, intelligent), any more than gays claim to be gay (meaning joyful, carefree)" Dawkins writing in Wired, 2003
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:48, archived)
# Yep, pretty sure he dropped the title for his book tour,
as Hitchens had persuaded him it sounded condescending.

Have you seen The Four Horsemen: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuyUz2XLp1E
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:58, archived)
# Yes, I have. Most enjoyable :)
Hitchens? Calling other people condescending? that's a bit ironic, isn't it? Still, I'm sure no-one wants to get into a Peoples-Front-of-Judea argument over semantics. Dawkins and the Brights movement still have a lot in common.

Reminds me that I still have Darwin's Dangerous Idea on my bookshelf and I still haven't read it! Must switch off computer and read more...
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:07, archived)
# I myself am a Hitchenist/Saganist
so I tend to give them a lot of slack where others wouldn't. No need to argue at all, we sound like we both know more than Fox News which is the most important thing. :)

Computers always get in the way of the bookshelf dammit! I must read Dawkins new one at some point.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:11, archived)
# I keep failing The Extended Phenotype.
Currently enjoying Ben Goldacre's Bad Science though - there's a book I can understand!

Right, I'm off out. Laters.
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 21:21, archived)
# *googles brights*
ah, right, i'm with you now
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:42, archived)
# "Hey mate. Just wanted to let you know I don't exist. Say hi to the family for me! Love, God. x"
Nice :]
(, Mon 12 Oct 2009, 20:40, archived)