Their numbering system
has been confused by combining two different lines. The 95/98/ME line is ultimately a development of the 3.1/3.11 line, shells that sit on top of DOS even if by the time of ME it was mainly used to bootstrap the system. The NT4.1/2000/XP/Vista/7 line is instead a development of the NT3.1 line. Which I don't think had an NT2.0 because they dicked with the numbers to get it in line with Windows 3.1. 2000 was I think NT5.0, XP NT5.1, then Vista was NT6.0 and 7 is NT6.1.
The numbers are fucking meaningless, in the end. So they want to call it '7'. It makes as much sense as the rest of their numbering...
( ,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:38,
archived)
The numbers are fucking meaningless, in the end. So they want to call it '7'. It makes as much sense as the rest of their numbering...