For reals!
That baby badger or whatever is probably being carried because he can't walk because his massive testicles get in the way.
edit: what three words would you lot use to describe having balls? I've been curious.
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:07,
archived)
edit: what three words would you lot use to describe having balls? I've been curious.
I would totally use these 3 words:
FUCKING AWESOME!
Oh hang on! Having balls I only needed 2 words!
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:13,
archived)
Oh hang on! Having balls I only needed 2 words!
Apparently my question was too demanding
not 100% helpful, but descriptive at least.
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:22,
archived)
I didn't mean two words wasn't ok
it was more a comment on your and Jamong's two word answers.
Also, nice juxtaposition of the super smashing great and the sad face.
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:31,
archived)
Also, nice juxtaposition of the super smashing great and the sad face.
I dont need to be asked to join in on this
delicate
happy
drunk
couldnt really think of a thrid word
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:14,
archived)
happy
drunk
couldnt really think of a thrid word
verry well thanks
im working afternoons so i get to hang out with the gay shift and rink gin xD
edit : gin break + and how are you?
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:25,
archived)
edit : gin break + and how are you?
I now have an image of an ice rink
made of gin I think this would be fun for the first few hours slowly turning into a dancing on ice specatcular im not using spell check anymore
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:45,
archived)
MAKE IT
MAKE IT RIGHT NOW MAKE IT WE CAN USE LIME ICE SKATES AND A TONIC ZAMBONIE!
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 5:19,
archived)
ok
no one else is doing it. Its some kind of profiler question about interaction like the water fall that was wet fast and noisy... i dont think they work
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:42,
archived)
oh dear
I seem to have drawn a conclusion from a perfectly normal ambiguouse question. The conclusion ironicly that the question was deliberately ambigouose in order to get me to missunderstand the question and answer a different question. In doing so I have uhhmm confused myself
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:58,
archived)
http://pinktentacle.com/2009/06/all-purpose-tanuki-testicles-prints-by-kuniyoshi/
whatever it is it is probably seventeenth century tanuki balls.
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:27,
archived)
You're right
*gets the trophy for spotting the only non-balls in the picture.*
( ,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 4:35,
archived)