
Then I'd be skeptical of their definition of assault.
( , Wed 20 May 2015, 12:50, Reply)

"“Someone touched my shoulder. When I turned back, the defendant asked me for directions to the mall. I guided him and then asked him why he had touched me. I couldn’t understand his language. He touched my hand again. I pulled my hand away, then I asked him to escort me to the police office. He refused. My two colleagues presented their police IDs. He refused to go with them to the police office and, when they tried to take him, he assaulted them,” claimed the policewoman."
Regardless of anyone's interpretation of 'molestation,' he fucks up at the end by refusing to comply with the cops. Who the fuck did he think he was? Even if there were language issues, given he was a tourist, that would sort of indicate he wasn't to thick or ignorant to understand what a cop is, or how to behave when gestured by cops to go with them.
( , Wed 20 May 2015, 13:13, Reply)

rather than massively embellishing the incident because they took a dislike to the guy.
( , Wed 20 May 2015, 14:13, Reply)

There's just something a bit odd about the surface of that story though
( , Wed 20 May 2015, 14:24, Reply)

Anyone in a position of authority is bent. It's the way the world works over there.
( , Wed 20 May 2015, 15:03, Reply)