Thank you
Thank you so much for your cunt-like response.
Older b3tans will remember us and may even be interested in seeing this. If you're not, keep your fucking mouth shut.
Oh for the good old days...
(
<>Dog www.stevelaker.blog, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 12:54,
Reply)
Actually, I thought the clip raised a fair point
and politely put. So if you are so rude as to start throwing the word cunt about, perhaps you are infact the cunt here.
Also, I see no reason to keep my mouth shut. I had an opinion on something you posted, so reflected that with a funnier post from a funnier /links poster. If you don't like people having opinions that differ to you, I suggest you are the one who should fuck off and stop being a stroppy bitch.
(
thiswasmyclone, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:21,
Reply)
Fair point, well made
It takes on a different meaning when directed at one's own kids though.
My apologies, now that I can see the context of your post and you do have a generally good point and make a fair observation.
(
<>Dog www.stevelaker.blog, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:27,
Reply)
Wow
Your post showed incredible restraint. Whereas I'm not the kind of parent who constantly gushes about my child, on the rare occasions when I do I certainly don't expect *anyone* to compare him to a wad of spunk.
I wouldn't have been so kind. Sweet b3ta-ddlers, btw.
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:32, Reply)
Seriously?
Is it that repulsive to you that your child be compared to a wad of spunk? I hate to think how you would respond upon discovering a biology text book.
(
thiswasmyclone, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:37,
Reply)
Your link
Could be construed as the grey guy having wanked over the pictures of kids he'd been sent. If you can see that, you'll understand why I took offence and responded so rudely to you: a knee-jerk reaction.
I accept the point that you were making as I'm not really interested in other people's kids (family and close friends aside), round robin Christmas letters, forwarded "funnies" and so on either. If you look at your Youtube clip in the context I saw it though, I'm sure you'll understand why I reacted the way I did.
(
<>Dog www.stevelaker.blog, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:43,
Reply)
Absolutely.
It hadn't even occured to me that it could be seen that way (and I don't think for a second that that is it's intended meaning), but I can understand your response in that context.
I'm quite confused though how valerie_hitler is so repulsed by the comparisson with spunk, though. For someone with hitler in ther name, she seems quite blasé about offending and yet easily offended - seeing how she's getting wound up by a biological fact.
(
thiswasmyclone, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 13:49,
Reply)