![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You could argue that, for example, artists would prefer "Imagination is inside exponential space time events.” to "“A wet person does not fear the rain.” then what is the point?
Or psychopaths would always chose “A wet person does not fear the rain.”
You could probably fit that into any way of presenting it as you see fit.
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 0:30, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You can argue anything you like.
It just carries more weight if your study can back it up with statistically significant findings.
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 0:41, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Tiny sample, statstics not significant. At best there may be a hint that there may be something worth studying.
Must be great working is a field where rigor isn't expected.
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 1:09, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
how statistically significant do you expect the findings to be, like, really?
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 1:10, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
We need a study.
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 1:16, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_6-iVz1R0o
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 1:25, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions
( , Sun 25 Sep 2016, 10:08, Share, Reply)