I've worked with one of the myrmidons in that article
and it was weird. Total devotion to the cause, total conviction: a fanatic.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 17:12, Share, Reply)
and it was weird. Total devotion to the cause, total conviction: a fanatic.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 17:12, Share, Reply)
Well this is not at all the sort of thing
that the Guardian always does.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 17:38, Share, Reply)
that the Guardian always does.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 17:38, Share, Reply)
reply to how journalism works 2 thread above:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv2uJRkeSY4 [shit] stirring stuff.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 22:00, Share, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv2uJRkeSY4 [shit] stirring stuff.
( , Fri 7 Oct 2016, 22:00, Share, Reply)
This is also how it works
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3800192/Fascinating-pictures-skinheads-rampage.html - 21 September 2016. Also the Dm likes to have at least 2-3 Nazi stories a week for no good reason. Oh wait I remember now Lord Rothermere was Hitlers mate and bankrolled the Nazis and used his vile rag for nazi propaganda.
What about the drip drip lies for 40 years about the EU from cunts like Johnson in the Telegraph and Spectator? How about News International and Murdoch? What about the right leaning press lying day after day about brexit? What about the DM and Murdoch trying to make a mockery of the press comission brought into to regulate them by blackmailing the MP in charge for nearly two years? What about the endless lies that they never get pulled up on and the ones they do get taken to court over the pathetic way they hide the apology and just pay the fines for ignoring the rules on the apology?
Is that how the press works?
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 1:26, Share, Reply)
It isn't praising skinheads for being Nazis.
But, that is for uncovering the vital fact that a long dead proprietor was a fascist sympathiser in the early 1930/. I never knew that, because every single guardian reader doesn't bang on about ad naseum.
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 8:39, Share, Reply)
But, that is for uncovering the vital fact that a long dead proprietor was a fascist sympathiser in the early 1930/. I never knew that, because every single guardian reader doesn't bang on about ad naseum.
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 8:39, Share, Reply)
Yes because anyone with a brain sees the DM carrying on the nazi propaganda on a daily basis.
A homepage headline from today - DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Theresa May's bold vision and the enemy within
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 9:58, Share, Reply)
if this was a guardian thread
at least three geography teachers with bad degrees from shit universities would have said 'whataboutery' by now.
I'll just point out that the one newspaper which named all of the killers in the steven lawrence case was the daily mail.
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 16:00, Share, Reply)
at least three geography teachers with bad degrees from shit universities would have said 'whataboutery' by now.
I'll just point out that the one newspaper which named all of the killers in the steven lawrence case was the daily mail.
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 16:00, Share, Reply)
If this was an alt right thread some white, inbred, incoherent, uneducated cunt would have shouted KICK THE SCUM OUT!!!! TAKE BACK CONTROL!!!! MAKE ALL THE FORRINS WEAR YELLOW STARS!!!
Still not answered my questions.
What about the drip drip lies for 40 years about the EU from cunts like Johnson in the Telegraph and Spectator? How about News International and Murdoch? What about the right leaning press lying day after day about brexit? What about the DM and Murdoch trying to make a mockery of the press comission brought into to regulate them by blackmailing the MP in charge for nearly two years? What about the endless lies that they never get pulled up on and the ones they do get taken to court over the pathetic way they hide the apology and just pay the fines for ignoring the rules on the apology?
Is that how the press works?
( , Sat 8 Oct 2016, 23:26, Share, Reply)