Jesus
literally five seconds of googling would have answered your question.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/02/milo-yiannopoulos-and-the-myth-of-the-gay-pedophile/517332/
https://www.yourtango.com/2017300192/all-details-about-milo-yiannopoulos-pedophile-and-sexual-assault-scandal-and-backlash
(, Wed 30 Jan 2019, 6:40, Reply)
I'm not in the habit of googling such things at work.
And remember, the onus for providing evidence is always on the one making the claim, not the listener that they're trying to convince.
I'll check those out later and give you a proper response.
Edit: I have checked those out.
The first link is barely even about the guy at all; it mentions his comments only to frame them in terms of an inaccurate interpretation by a specific Vox journalist. It then heads off on a tangent about ultra-conservative politics in the 1970s and earlier (which is what the article is actually about). Milo's name is quite clearly just being used as clickbait in that article.
The second link is indeed relevant. And very clearly shows that his comments were a good deal more nuanced than that.
(, Wed 30 Jan 2019, 12:09, Reply)