Indeed it doesn't.
Like I say, I did see quite a few think-pieces speculating that this exact scenario could come about. Sure, they were outnumbered by the "Biden's got a 90% chance of winning" brigade, but even they usually remembered to point out that 90% ≠ 100%. Perhaps this scenario stuck in my head because it gave me the most fear.
( , Wed 4 Nov 2020, 14:42, Share, Reply)
Like I say, I did see quite a few think-pieces speculating that this exact scenario could come about. Sure, they were outnumbered by the "Biden's got a 90% chance of winning" brigade, but even they usually remembered to point out that 90% ≠ 100%. Perhaps this scenario stuck in my head because it gave me the most fear.
( , Wed 4 Nov 2020, 14:42, Share, Reply)
Anyway,
Biden has now crept slightly ahead in the counts in Michigan and Wisconsin, as well as Nevada. *If* he holds on to his leads in those three states, they would take him to the magic 270, *if* the states that AP has already called turn out to be correct.
( , Wed 4 Nov 2020, 14:59, Share, Reply)
Biden has now crept slightly ahead in the counts in Michigan and Wisconsin, as well as Nevada. *If* he holds on to his leads in those three states, they would take him to the magic 270, *if* the states that AP has already called turn out to be correct.
( , Wed 4 Nov 2020, 14:59, Share, Reply)