
You can do both of those.
Timestretching can be done by selecting a segment of a sample, going to 'audio' at the top and selecting 'stretch to...' or something similar. Took me a while to figure out but that's only cos I hadn't read the manual. It's a piece of piss once you have the knowhow! You can also map a piece directly to the time signature you're using, rather than stretching it and squishing it til it fits.
Also, a lot of people favour Logic over actual mastering software like Ozone or WaveLab...
( , Wed 30 Jan 2008, 20:58, Reply)

But i use logic 5.5 on a PC, and the way it processes sound is much inferior to a dedicated audio suite... Apparently this has been dealt with on the Mac versions since.
I didn't know about the time stretching function.
( , Wed 30 Jan 2008, 21:01, Reply)

Being a smug up-their-own-arse mac user, I look down with contempt upon lowly PCs.
( , Wed 30 Jan 2008, 21:04, Reply)

I've considered changing to Cubase... or indeed getting a Mac.
( , Wed 30 Jan 2008, 21:07, Reply)

I cannot stand Cubase.
It's not that it lacks features or anything, it's just horrifically unintuitive to use, to the point that it actually makes it really frustrating.
( , Wed 30 Jan 2008, 21:13, Reply)