repeating, myself, if your definition of the term "natural" is "everything", which isn't a widely held one in this context or any other, than it's fatuous to use it as a defence of nuclear power like the Chernobyl plant
And by fatuous I'm using the dictionary definition of "silly and pointless", but feel free to substitute in your own definition as you have want to do.
"Nothing wrong with nuclear power plants"
"Why not?"
"Well, they're made of stuff that's found in the universe. Same as ox tongues and supernovas and ak47s and anthrax bacillus. all natural. Need I say more?"
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 3:35,
Reply)
nope - try again
hint: less fiction - more science
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 3:37,
Reply)
well, I was hoping to draw brb out to double down again rather than concede to an obvious but minor error
because we all know the sky falls on your head when you admit to saying something wrong or stupid
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 3:54,
Reply)