Ok. Very good.
What do you think of the actual content of the article itself? Could you apply your devastating critical analysis to what was actually said in that specific article? Why do you insist instead on generalised criticism of the publication? I posted a link to an article. One article. I didn’t post a link to The Spectator’s subscription page. What do you think about the article you didn’t read about the show you didn’t watch?
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Sat 15 May 2021, 15:13,
Reply)
all I learnt from the article was that the writer seemed both surprised and upset coogan's appearance had changed slightly in the two decades since I'm Alan Partridge ran
he managed to shitcan it without describing a single episode or plotline or gag from the new series. Perhaps he never watched the new series as well? so there's not much to critically analyse and it really wasn't worth linking to, so I thought instead I'd make a broader point about the rag itself
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 15 May 2021, 23:02,
Reply)