me talking about the spectator really upset, you didn't it?
identifying with that burberry of the publishing world must have been a source of much of your unwarranted pretentions.
When we look at who the mental one is, I'd ask you to think about your first comment above and the common thread running through most of our exchanges, which is Why? What prompted you to respond to my speculation about power of arrest? You weren't making a counter argument. You didn't have anything to say or add. you simply saw I was having a point of view and as in all the previous times you felt moved to try to insult me. What sociopathy motivates you? I have my own theories as to why you're a toxic little dweeb, but do you have the tools to understand yourself? Perhaps not. Sometimes the cause is also that which limits you understanding that cause.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 22 May 2021, 13:35,
Reply)
You hate The Spectator and think it's an evil right wing rag. I get that.
The link I replied to wasn't about The Spectator and the link I posted, while published in The Spectator, was specifically and exclusively about the content of the link. Yet on and on you go about whatever you've got your knickers in a twist about in the most inane and insane exercise in whataboutery imaginable projecting all kind of bollocks. You haven't watched the TV show. You didn't read the review. I doubt you've ever read anything in The Spectator. You're mental.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Sat 22 May 2021, 15:34,
Reply)