just because you're unable to follow an argument, it doesn't imply the other person is mental, though I'm sure it's comforting to believe so
if the spectator run a poor review of coogan, and I point out that it's in line with the attack pieces they've been running on coogan since he gave evidence at leveson, and indicative of the falling standards of their writing (and I provided a few links to illustrate my point), then that's relevant. It's just your mind being unable to switch gears, prufock, possibly hampered by how personally invested in the spectator you are. you thought people would just pile in like the spectator readers' comments, but found yourself in an argument about the mag itself and were unable to articulate anything other than "please don't talk about this" and call me mental. it's about as satisfying as our other exchanges, but like above, still you persist.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 9 Jun 2021, 2:15,
Share,
Reply)
