it actually makes the statue more significant if people get a full picture of the shit stuff along with the good. Tearing it down doesn't change the past, it just makes a few do-gooders feel like they've done something while actually doing fuck all, but leaving it up might inform a few more passers-by. Perhaps they might start thinking about zero-hour contracts and vietnamese sweatshops their Gap pants are made in and how modern global wealth still exploits people. or not, but at least it'll still give the pigeons a place to shit
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 12:20, Reply)
interesting article on how Germany is dealing with it
www.inquirer.com/philly/opinion/commentary/charlottesville-nazis-germany-communists-monuments-trump-20170817.html-2
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 12:25, Reply)
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 12:42, Reply)
that's as german as strudel or faceshitting
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 12:59, Reply)
Adolf Hitler 1889 -1945
Vegan and dog lover
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 12:46, Reply)
but to make it more relatable to younger people maybe just 'influencer'
Edit: you could also have a pigeon proof screen on top displaying people who have just been described online as worse than Hitler
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 13:06, Reply)
though I do like "influencer"
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 22:56, Reply)
It sparked a national and an international reaction if you remember. Locally, it caused Colston's name to be removed from street names, pubs and schools but more importantly it shone a spotlight on the unaccountable, undemocratic power that the Merchant Venturers wield in the city and it's given a boost to those who'd like to see that power removed. So it definitely has done something.
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 13:13, Reply)
You now think democracy's a good thing? You didn't seem so keen before. You've been raging against it for years. Should we have a national vote on statues maybe? See how the fucking nation feels about the Cenotaph being boarded up...
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 19:19, Reply)
I'm seeing a stalwart democrat. Flattered, but I'm not arsed to search your posts for a response.
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 19:27, Reply)
because that was the thing that was bad, not the fact that there's a statue in a park. I mean perhaps if Bristol were having a "we love Colston" parade that might be something. That's the issue with many on the left, they conflate symbols of the thing that's bad with the thing that is bad itself, and spend most of their energy attacking those symbols, be it statues or words like "manholes" or actors putting on blackface. Attacking symbols is easy and makes people think they've done something significant, but guess fucking what? The world didn't actually get any less unfair because of your sanctimonious gestures toppling statues and street name-changing. Some black kid on a council estate didn't turn into a vauxhall driving middle-class suburbanite because you joined in that twitter attack about an actor wearing blackface. That would take actual, difficult change like reforming the tax system to reduce social inequity on a fundamental level. Dealing with symbols is easy. "sparked a debate" my arse. It's the self-congratulatory smugness that shits me
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 22:28, Reply)
www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2020-09-14/bristols-colston-society-to-end-after-275-years-at-the-end-of-this-year
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 5:50, Reply)
picture some poor wretch from dahomey lying in a crude hut, manacled on some alabama plantation, the skin flayed off his back from a recent lashing and weeping pus, the latest of many arbitrary punishment whippings as he's slowly worked to death picking cotton. But he hears a voice in his ear:
"don't worry, someday a bunch of earnest middle class whites will unite and together they'll have a brass statue of a long dead figure who had an indirect commercial relationship with your bondage in another country removed from a park. you see, it all evens out in the end and everyone's happy thanks to their sacrifice and struggle on your behalf. swings and roundabouts, really"
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 7:23, Reply)
He was deputy governor of the only English company allowed to trade slaves at that time. What's indirect about that?
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 7:37, Reply)
but for arguments sake, let's say you're unfamiliar with the terms.
if i say " indirect commercial relationship with your bondage" in reference to our nominal slave, it means he has no physical relationship with the slave. he didn't capture the slave, whip the slave, own the slave as personal chattel. he probably never got closer than 4000 miles to the slave, though the organisation he was deputy director of profited commercially from the slave trade. that's what indirect means. there's a relationship, but it's not a direct one with this slave, its through a whole series of intermediaries and behind contracts made with those intermediaries. it's an "indirect" relationship with the slave.
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 8:16, Reply)
But sadly you won't
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 8:24, Reply)
(pssst. "indirect" in this sense means while not really addressing my argument at least it references part of it however irrelevantly
but the "no, you're dumb" is the final stage of coping and the one that signifies to me there's no more interest to be had in it
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 8:39, Reply)
I'm saying that for some reason you've got it into your head that you should have an opinion on all this without first knowing some quite basic facts (or even reading the original article I posted it seems). And now you can't back down.
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 8:56, Reply)
so far you've talked about parades, made pedantic points on terminology, and now seem to be intent on ad-hominen face-saving. What you're not doing is saying anything pertinent to the point I made or making any counterargument. It's just dull, beni. I'm not infallible, but it'd be nice once in a while to have someone capable of responding to the actual point.
Now reading between the lines (the counterpart to accusing me of not knowing anything about Bristol is that in contrast, you do know it intimately) my guess is that you were personally somehow involved in this statue campaign, and by pointing out it's cosmic fucking pointlessness, I'm attacking something that hitherto you've taken some sort of unwarranted sense of achievement out of. I know that as you've basically reached the name-calling part of the debate it's not something you're likely to confess. But I suspect I'm right
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 10:10, Reply)
And I simply cant be arsed to decipher it all
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 11:52, Reply)
and it must be going on a year since I had a decent rant on b3ta. so sorry that I picked your post in particular. I think there was some merit in the wider point I was making about such gestures which is why I said it, but it seems you're only interested in the details of the colston case you posted and I guess that's your prerogative
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 12:08, Reply)
It was dragged out deliberately and was never going to happen. This information is readily available if you read before posting. x
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 19:23, Reply)
if some tried to change the plaque then good, it just demonstrates there's plenty who agree with my view. these kind of gestures and statue toppling are a global issue, cecil rhodes and american civil war generals and franco favourites. To me it's straws. all these people around the world who swapped plastic straws for paper and thinking they were making a difference, while at the very same time millions of tonnes of household recycling, from these very same smug little do-gooders in the west who were patting themselves on the back for buying a M&S pack of metal straws, was getting dumped on china where most of it went into landfills or was burnt in toxic fires. not that people gave a fuck what happened to it once they sorted their plastics and the council took it away. But hey! look at our straws. And even recycling is a minor issue compared to the traincrash of global warming. But they felt they've "done something" by switching to paper straws. Just like people feel they've made a difference by toppling statues and congratulating themselves for having so much more right-on views that these fuckers in the past whose evidence that people once respected them needs to be erased like stalin's ex head of secret police. they were all cunts and if we'd lived back then we'd have been so much better.
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 11:10, Reply)