Basically this says "We have no bloody clue what's liable to happen, but here's something to SCARE YOU!! (and sell magazines)".
I'm of the opinion that the planet takes care of itself, and has warm and cold cycles etc, and that it's standard human arrogance to believe we can have anything other than the most minor of effects on it.
(, Fri 27 Feb 2009, 23:27, Reply)
and not with wankers like Jeremy Clarkson, who's attitude is not to give a toss, when something very real is happening to our planet
You have got to be about the most naive fucking spastic to not realize the world is warming up, and the human race is going to have to make some drastic changes; given it's utterly obvious by now; even after that twat Bush's approach to science and his neo conservative chums understanding of it.
(, Fri 27 Feb 2009, 23:41, Reply)
he seems just to be saying it's not human influence.
I think we should try to prevent it, but as more of a side-project to avoid the damage and take advantage of the changes that we face.
I might make a youtube video teaching everyone how to wash with a small basin of fresh water, and maybe some sand (exfoliating is very important...); though really I just think a topless me would drive the viewing figures right up!
(, Fri 27 Feb 2009, 23:44, Reply)
I'm in full agreement with the development of green technologies, cutting back on the many and varied ways we pollute our environment etc. You don't crap in your own back garden, after all. If the planet is on it's way to warming up significantly though, 1) It's highly unlikely to be because of us, and 2) There's sod all we can do about it other than develop methods of coping with it.
Humanity needs to cut the "Green Angst" bullshit and knuckle down developing stuff like high efficiency solar power stations, fusion power, and cheap desalination plants. Growing up a bit and starting to respect the native animal and plant life would be a step in the right direction, too.
(, Fri 27 Feb 2009, 23:56, Reply)
people denying a human impact on climate change are simply laughable these days; and sadly it's far worse than we imagined. Hence a very good link above^
(, Sat 28 Feb 2009, 0:00, Reply)
short of a massive nuclear deployment, how the hell do you think a few billion primitive life forms can have any significant impact on 5.9736×10^24 kg of stellar body?
Humans have a notoriously poor sense of scale.
(especially males...)
Edit:
Besides, there are SIGNIFICANTLY larger things for us to worry about. Ever spoken to a Geologist about the Shield Volcano under Yellowstone National Park? The one that's about 40,000 years late, and would make Krakatoa look like a Swan Vesta? Bare in mind that Krakatoa caused a 20-year mini-ice age...
(, Sat 28 Feb 2009, 0:11, Reply)
You obviously simply aren't close to having a clue; and you are very boring at replying to; if you don't think a hundred years of industrial impact hasn't had an effect of the earth's fragile ecosystem, there is little more than I can be bothered to type.
And with that I'm off to bed, to see Arsenal tomorrow
(, Sat 28 Feb 2009, 0:25, Reply)
Some of these eco-types really don't like having their world-view challenged, do they?
Ps. I'm obviously not the only person who thinks this...
www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/25/jstor_climate_report_translation/
Edit:
Pps. Arsenal suck.
(, Sat 28 Feb 2009, 0:39, Reply)