You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 288837 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post You need either:
1. A digital camera capable of IR. They are expensive.

or

2. An old film camera without IR filters, and some IR film. Relatively cheap.

If you go for (1) I think there are only a couple of options. Fuji did an IR+UV version of their S3 Pro, but it cost a fortune. Can't think of anything more modern off the top of my head.

If you do UV stuff as well you generally need absurdly expensive quartz lenses - best to stick with IR.

I think it helps to have an IR or UV filter as well, but I don't think it is essential.
(, Wed 11 Mar 2009, 10:49, Reply)
This is a normal post Thanks...
... for that
(, Wed 11 Mar 2009, 11:07, Reply)
This is a normal post this...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_photography
(, Wed 11 Mar 2009, 11:37, Reply)
This is a normal post Even better.
Shame about the kodak film. Looks like a bugger to get film at all for 35mm.
(, Wed 11 Mar 2009, 11:51, Reply)