
when it pays off the interest of the loan given to the US government from the privately owned Fed reserve banks
in view of news on Wesley Snipes
there's a group of ex IRS agents who have gone public over this;
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JKjkqkfiyE
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 9:50, Reply)

Income tax purely goes to pay the interest on government loans from the Fed, which goes into the pockets of its private owners. I think it's roughly 250 billion per annum, so when you hear that Bill gates is the richest man on earth, think of the Fed owners, behind closed doors, unaccountable and reaping enough money to make Solomon blush.
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 10:08, Reply)

it's neither Federal nor has Reserves, since 1913 its aim was to always have the ability to print money no longer linked to the gold standard - basically money printed from thin air - a debt instrument (they tried 3 times prior to install a central Bank)
when it pumps billions into the economy now to stave off depression it is actually devaluing the dollar and making the situation far worse in the long run
the economy will never be stable if the money supply is taken off the gold standard - however it does give those that control the supply huge power
there's a great book by Edward G Griffin on this subject "The Creature from Jekyll Island" (as you know ;) ) here's the youtube link (for others)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWKlz2Z4Nlo
www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm
it's the part of the Wesley Snipes story they don't mention
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 10:19, Reply)

It's all fiat currency now, isn't it? Or have I missed something?
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 10:46, Reply)

that's the point
the interesting story is how it was manipulated into existence
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 10:48, Reply)

the obligatory 'tinfoil hat' comment on anything that's remotely off the main stream concensus. well done
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 13:07, Reply)

It's interesting in the main, but it's obviously the sort of thing you *MUST* come to your own conclusions about. If she lets people believe her without their own first hand research it means nothing, and might as well be a stupid email copied from snopes.
She does get a little off the ball towards the end, saying things like those who own nthe media own the federal reserve or whatever it was. True or not, that *sounds* dodgy when as a statement out of the blue (which is relatively was from the level of detail she was into in the rest of it)
( , Fri 25 Apr 2008, 13:31, Reply)