What's wrong with you?
Let's face it, every one of us has at some point checked out someone attractive only to realize that they're under age (in other words, jailbait). But this...this is just wrong. You obviously had your suspicions regarding her age or you wouldn't have asked her about it - this shows that you knew what you were doing. The part where you irreversibly crossed the line from horny perv to paedo was when you made the decision to have sex with her on the basis that she wouldn't tell anyone, despite you knowing that she was underage by her own admission. Then you tell us that you "fucked her twice more and sent her home."

At first I was in two minds about whether this made you a "child abuser". After all, the kid kept her age from you intentionally until you got to your place and made the effort of convincing you (for lack of a better word) to have sex with her, so perhaps "abuse" isn't the right word here - aside from a legal technicality if she was under 16. At first I figured that calling you a child abuser is inaccurate.

Thinking about the whole situation however reveals that you were willing to have sex with - in your words - an underdeveloped girl that you knew might be under the legal age of consent, and judging by your story you decided to have sex with her on the basis that she wasn't going to tell anyone.

You know what that makes you? A fucking paedophile. That you ended the story by stating that you "fucked her twice more and sent her home" just hammers the point in further.

Seriously, for once I hope this is just an example of some idiot trolling B3ta to sate their hunger for attention and that the story isn't true.

If it's not, then perhaps you should consider the fact that you obviously think that what you did was not only OK, but expected. That it was a historic case of abuse doesn't make things better, either. It makes it worse. After 20 years, you still think this is OK? It's not.

You fucking paedophile.
(thecurriedavenger, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 1:47, Reply)