Eccentrics
We all know someone who's a little bit strange - Mum's UFO abduction secret, or the mad Uncle who isn't allowed within 400 yards of Noel Edmonds.
Tell us about your family eccentrics, or just those you've met but don't think you're related to.
(Suggested by sugar_tits)
( , Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:08)
We all know someone who's a little bit strange - Mum's UFO abduction secret, or the mad Uncle who isn't allowed within 400 yards of Noel Edmonds.
Tell us about your family eccentrics, or just those you've met but don't think you're related to.
(Suggested by sugar_tits)
( , Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:08)
« Go Back
Horace/Stanley...
This is fast becoming less and less about family and more just about general lunatics, so I thought I might as well chime in with this mad-man. I remember Horace being told of before on these pages on the Local Nutters QOTW, but he fits in here as well.
He has three discernable names which he is known as, Horace, The Best of Luck Guy, and lastly but definately the best, Stanley.
He is called Horace because that is his name (probably)
He is called Best of Luck Guy because he can be heard screaming the best of luck at the top of his lungs wherever he goes. Used to come into Sainsburys in Muswell Hill when I worked there as a till monkey, walk around the ENTIRE store with nothing but peach flavoured water in his basket, and yelling "The BEST of luck! The BEEEEST of luck!!!" Always made my day.
If you called him Stanley however, it was a different matter all together. He'd go fucking mental!! His new mantra became "CUNT! YOUR BASTARD YOU FUCKING CUNT! YOU FUCKING CUNT! YOU FUCKING BASTARD, etc". For ages
In fact, here he is,
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-YHxE_tn4
A true mentalist leg-end.
( , Sun 2 Nov 2008, 14:02, 5 replies)
This is fast becoming less and less about family and more just about general lunatics, so I thought I might as well chime in with this mad-man. I remember Horace being told of before on these pages on the Local Nutters QOTW, but he fits in here as well.
He has three discernable names which he is known as, Horace, The Best of Luck Guy, and lastly but definately the best, Stanley.
He is called Horace because that is his name (probably)
He is called Best of Luck Guy because he can be heard screaming the best of luck at the top of his lungs wherever he goes. Used to come into Sainsburys in Muswell Hill when I worked there as a till monkey, walk around the ENTIRE store with nothing but peach flavoured water in his basket, and yelling "The BEST of luck! The BEEEEST of luck!!!" Always made my day.
If you called him Stanley however, it was a different matter all together. He'd go fucking mental!! His new mantra became "CUNT! YOUR BASTARD YOU FUCKING CUNT! YOU FUCKING CUNT! YOU FUCKING BASTARD, etc". For ages
In fact, here he is,
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PO-YHxE_tn4
A true mentalist leg-end.
( , Sun 2 Nov 2008, 14:02, 5 replies)
Horace!
Blimey! Haven't seen him for a while.
Always used to brighten up my trips to Sainsburys (in Camden..he got around did Horace)
THE BEST OF LUCK!
(I always used to say 'Thank You' back. It's only polite.)
( , Mon 3 Nov 2008, 10:56, closed)
Blimey! Haven't seen him for a while.
Always used to brighten up my trips to Sainsburys (in Camden..he got around did Horace)
THE BEST OF LUCK!
(I always used to say 'Thank You' back. It's only polite.)
( , Mon 3 Nov 2008, 10:56, closed)
Just what kind of cunts
films hobos and puts the films on youtube? You will not get a click for this boring story, and no bonus points at all for exposing a harmless, vulnerable, mentally ill person to the entire world and expecting us to laugh with you.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 10:56, closed)
films hobos and puts the films on youtube? You will not get a click for this boring story, and no bonus points at all for exposing a harmless, vulnerable, mentally ill person to the entire world and expecting us to laugh with you.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 10:56, closed)
Hey!
Fuck you. I didnt film it, and I agree with you, its wrong that people do aggravate him enough to make him spack out so spectacularly. He's a lovely fella, as I pointed out before he's the 'Best of luck guy' to me first and foremost. But, in the interests of being fucking funny, and this being b3ta after all, this is worth a share. There are many videos on youtube of Horace all over North London doing his thing, some are disturbing, some are just fucking hilarious. On one of them he comes out of his mantra and completely calmly asks "Is that a mobile phone or a tape recorder?"
Now kindly fuck off, good chap, there's the door.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 11:26, closed)
Fuck you. I didnt film it, and I agree with you, its wrong that people do aggravate him enough to make him spack out so spectacularly. He's a lovely fella, as I pointed out before he's the 'Best of luck guy' to me first and foremost. But, in the interests of being fucking funny, and this being b3ta after all, this is worth a share. There are many videos on youtube of Horace all over North London doing his thing, some are disturbing, some are just fucking hilarious. On one of them he comes out of his mantra and completely calmly asks "Is that a mobile phone or a tape recorder?"
Now kindly fuck off, good chap, there's the door.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 11:26, closed)
No,
it isn't funny, not even by the standards of this QOTW, and it doesn't get funnier because there is video proof. And compared to a lot of other posts where people have found it quite sufficient to relay stories of unidentifiable relatives, neighbours etc, you choose to actively spread a video which makes it easy to identify the person concerned. It is very easy to stop and consider: "if I had severe psychiatric health issues like this man, would I want complete strangers to record me while I was displaying the symptoms thereof, while laughing at me, and then put them up on the internet for the whole world to see, laugh at, and distribute, without me having any control over it?". And of course the answer is no; I wouldn't, and you wouldn't.
And it doesn't matter that you find him "a lovely fella" as you claim, because obviously to him, or me or you, if we CARED to put ourselves in his shoes, there would be fuck-all difference. You're still laughing at him.
The same principle applies to all other kinds of gloatware on the internet: if I was pictured or filmed having an accident, getting hit by a truck, being beaten up by a mugger, falling clumsily into a hole or walking into a doorpost, caught having a wank, or maybe just being ugly, I wouldn't want it documented and spread beyond my control for other people's entertainment. It's a very simple and easily understandable principle.
Your defence is: I didn't make this video, I'm just watching and distributing it. Because someone else did it it's okay and I'm free of guilt and responsibility. It is also okay because it's funny, and the spirit of this social group (B3ta) allows and encourages things like this.
But it's only funny because it didn't happen to you, and referring to the accepted behaviouralistic norms of B3ta, a network of anonymous internet users, as a alibi, that is just not on. I could and wanted to use stronger words than "not on" to emphasize the magnitude of notonness here, but I was brought up very well. I can put it differently by saying: you have no moral obligation towards B3ta, you answer to this man, this "hobo", and the fact that he as one of the weakest members of society cannot defend himself or take care of his own interests makes no moral difference at all.
Now, you may feel unfairly singled out, because you are not the only one doing this. The reason for all this is simply that I started reading the QOTW backwards and this was the story that definitely put me off spending any more time on it.
What I want to say, to reiterate, can very simply be summarized as: before you film another person in a compromizing situation, you should walk a mile in their shoes; that way, when you put the video up on youtube and tell people about it, you are a mile away and even if they find you and make you take it down the damage is already done.
And I don't want the door, you have it back. Feed it to your cat, or sell if for charity. Maybe in aid of the psychiatric care of England, which seems to be lacking.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 17:22, closed)
it isn't funny, not even by the standards of this QOTW, and it doesn't get funnier because there is video proof. And compared to a lot of other posts where people have found it quite sufficient to relay stories of unidentifiable relatives, neighbours etc, you choose to actively spread a video which makes it easy to identify the person concerned. It is very easy to stop and consider: "if I had severe psychiatric health issues like this man, would I want complete strangers to record me while I was displaying the symptoms thereof, while laughing at me, and then put them up on the internet for the whole world to see, laugh at, and distribute, without me having any control over it?". And of course the answer is no; I wouldn't, and you wouldn't.
And it doesn't matter that you find him "a lovely fella" as you claim, because obviously to him, or me or you, if we CARED to put ourselves in his shoes, there would be fuck-all difference. You're still laughing at him.
The same principle applies to all other kinds of gloatware on the internet: if I was pictured or filmed having an accident, getting hit by a truck, being beaten up by a mugger, falling clumsily into a hole or walking into a doorpost, caught having a wank, or maybe just being ugly, I wouldn't want it documented and spread beyond my control for other people's entertainment. It's a very simple and easily understandable principle.
Your defence is: I didn't make this video, I'm just watching and distributing it. Because someone else did it it's okay and I'm free of guilt and responsibility. It is also okay because it's funny, and the spirit of this social group (B3ta) allows and encourages things like this.
But it's only funny because it didn't happen to you, and referring to the accepted behaviouralistic norms of B3ta, a network of anonymous internet users, as a alibi, that is just not on. I could and wanted to use stronger words than "not on" to emphasize the magnitude of notonness here, but I was brought up very well. I can put it differently by saying: you have no moral obligation towards B3ta, you answer to this man, this "hobo", and the fact that he as one of the weakest members of society cannot defend himself or take care of his own interests makes no moral difference at all.
Now, you may feel unfairly singled out, because you are not the only one doing this. The reason for all this is simply that I started reading the QOTW backwards and this was the story that definitely put me off spending any more time on it.
What I want to say, to reiterate, can very simply be summarized as: before you film another person in a compromizing situation, you should walk a mile in their shoes; that way, when you put the video up on youtube and tell people about it, you are a mile away and even if they find you and make you take it down the damage is already done.
And I don't want the door, you have it back. Feed it to your cat, or sell if for charity. Maybe in aid of the psychiatric care of England, which seems to be lacking.
( , Tue 4 Nov 2008, 17:22, closed)
« Go Back