Mud, rubbish sex, food poisoning and the Quo replacing the headline act you've mortgaged your house to see. Tell us your experiences
Question from Chart Cat
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 13:33)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
magnificent breasts can only do so much
for example, there is such a thing as boobs too big for a tit wank
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:10, 3 replies)
I feel the need to subject this to scientific testing. Rigorous scientific testing.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:15, closed)
I hate to be the one to break it to you, particularly after all the SERIOUZ INTERNET BUSINESS today on /offtopic, but...
You have a micro-willy.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:16, closed)
my ex was really short and had 36 GG boobs. it just wasn't possible.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:18, closed)
as one of the test cases in my rigorous scientific testing programme.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:19, closed)
And there is contact with the female form then I could shoot my gloop in mere seconds.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 17:26, closed)
and that there's nothing wrong with short women. Some of my partners have been very well supplied in the breast department, and it's not been a problem.
Of course, I'm open to more testing, just to be sure..
(, Wed 10 Jun 2009, 13:42, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread