It's a flaw in the post
since the post was a defence against me pointing out you have no references.

"Google them" isn't a reference. It's not up to anyone else to find out whether there's information that supports what you're saying.

You have no references for what you're saying.
(apeloverage committed the vile act of onanism on, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:00, 2 replies)

no, it was an instruction
Why the sweet fuck should I waste my precious time? You've provided no reference to your tinfoil hatted idiocy that he's at risk of extradition to the US, either.

In any case, my post wasn't to provide references to back up B_D, it was to provide more depth of information, to clarify the point. If you don't believe it, fine, suit yourself, but don't whine when your bollocks is shot down on here, eh?

Magistrates court

high court

supreme court
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:08, closed)

Ten steps ahead of me, as usual.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:11, closed)

This is the most piss weak argument I've ever seen.
You're just floundering now because you know that ten seconds on Google will prove you wrong.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:09, closed)