b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Guilty Laughs » Post 803352 | Search
This is a question Guilty Laughs

Are you the kind of person who laughs when they see a cat getting run over? Tell us about the times your sense of humour has gone beyond taste and decency.

Suggested by SnowyTheRabbit

(, Thu 22 Jul 2010, 15:19)
Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Indeed - it does seem that logic isn't your strongest suite.

(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:29, 1 reply)
"Oh, and while I'm at it, punching random grannies in the face in case they're martial arts-trained suicide bombers."
And you're somehow claiming the above as analogous to jumping a red light.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:37, closed)
This is also turning into a bit of a row
So let's agree to disagree.

edit: hehe saw your deleted post there. Concede? Never! Muhahaha. Now I'm off to run over babies and punch grannies in the face from my honda-bmx-ninja-bikeamathing
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:37, closed)
No - I'm taking your logic of self-preservation and the law only applying to me as and when I see fit to it's logical conclusion
IE - I can do what I like, but other people should do as they're told.

Your position is one of hypocrisy - on the one hand you complain that car drivers endanger cyclists, but on the other you take that as justification to endanger pedestrians and feel no need to apologise.

So one rule for you, another for everyone else.

I don't agree with that position.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:44, closed)
Nope, that's not my viewpoint
Everyone should be able to break a law that endangers them, as long as it doesn't endanger others.

/edit ... and if it does endanger others, that it endangers them LESS than it would you by not breaking that law. E.g. a quick whizz over the lights with nothing coming (proceeding with caution), versus a chance (however small) of getting killed.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:46, closed)
Right, OK.
So if I own a car it's OK for me to endanger cyclists if I feel endangered by trucks.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:48, closed)
Nope
Read what I typed:

"Everyone should be able to break a law that endangers them, as long as it doesn't endanger others."

If there's no cyclist there, then by all means take evasive (or even pre-emptive) action.

"And if it does endanger others, that it endangers them LESS than it would you by not breaking that law."

If there's a cyclist there, killing the cyclist to preserve yourself is never acceptable.

/edit: and now I do have to go home. Carefully. On my brompton.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:50, closed)
Hahaha
Thanks for playing.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 17:54, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1