b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Irrational Hatred » Post 1143184 | Search
This is a question Irrational Hatred

People who say "less" when they mean "fewer" ought to be turned into soup, the soup fed to baboons and the baboons fired into an active volcano. What has you grinding your teeth with rage, and why?

Suggested by Smash Monkey

(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 14:36)
Pages: Latest, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, ... 1

« Go Back

Loose and Lose
It is very simple and easy to learn. Loose has two little 'o' shapes in it and usually means 'not tight', like your mother. Lose has only one. Which usually means 'to misplace or surrender' like your mother's virginity.

The inability to get these two very simple words right really winds me up, ESPECIALLY when the little fuckwit who does it earns about three times as much as I am (and yes I did tell him).
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:48, 4 replies)
That's not irrational at all
I share your loathing - and include the people who don't know the difference between its and it's; and there, their and they're.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:51, closed)
your definition touches me
In the same spot your mum used to. Have a click
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:53, closed)
Agree.
It's my pet hate.
I always wonder what happens when those people need to use the word "loose" as in, "Her trousers were loose".

Do they spell it "looose"?

EDIT: No, it's not my pet hate. I fucking hate it completely. It shows a lack of any thought or intelligence. How the fuck can two 'o's be in the word 'lose' - I might even understand "loze" or "looze", but you'd have to be as thick as pig shit to spell 'lose' as 'loose'.
Sorry.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:57, closed)
Similar to my personal favourite:
'Lead' for 'led'.

They led them out to face a barrage of lead, with the captain in the lead.
(, Thu 31 Mar 2011, 21:25, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Latest, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, ... 1