Home
»
Question of the Week
»
Mad Stuff You've Done To Get Someone To Sleep With You
»
Post 76534
| Search
Mad Stuff You've Done To Get Someone To Sleep With You
Alexxx says "We've all gone a little too far at one time or another to get a girl, or a guy, to sleep with us. I've a friend who spent close to a thousand pounds orchestrating a terrible day for a collegue, so he could comfort her and get in her knickers. Only to find out she had a boyfriend, who proposed in order to cheer her up."
So, how far have you gone?
( , Fri 13 Apr 2007, 9:01)
Alexxx says "We've all gone a little too far at one time or another to get a girl, or a guy, to sleep with us. I've a friend who spent close to a thousand pounds orchestrating a terrible day for a collegue, so he could comfort her and get in her knickers. Only to find out she had a boyfriend, who proposed in order to cheer her up."
So, how far have you gone?
( , Fri 13 Apr 2007, 9:01)
« Go Back
I'm a girl
And it's pretty easy to get men into bed. Can we have a non sex-biased question of the week now please?
Pedantic man edit: When I say sex-biased I do obviously mean gender-biased
Mod edit: Non-sex biased? I think you are adding the bias there... thank your lucky stars you find it easy.
Edit: Woo - mod edit! I feel special.
From an evolutionary perspective there is no reason for males to be at all choosey about who they have sex with since males are only limited in the number of offspring they can produce by the rate at which they can persuade females to mate with them. Females on the other hand are limited by the gestational period and by the period of parental care and so need to be more selective about whom they mate with. For this reason, men have evolved to sleep around while women have evolved to look for men that are likely to stick around and help them bring up their spawn. Thus, if you are just looking for sex it is easier to get it if you are female than if you are male. Of course the introduction of contraception has changed this somewhat, but until society changes enough so that women who sleep around are not viewed as slags then it is going to continue to be difficult for men to get their legs over.
I could go on to point out that from a Darwinian point of view the kind of chavs you see on Trisha that have 8 kids by 6 different women by the age of 22 are in fact fitter than the rest of the population who know how to use a condom, but that would just be depressing.
( , Fri 13 Apr 2007, 9:25, Reply)
And it's pretty easy to get men into bed. Can we have a non sex-biased question of the week now please?
Pedantic man edit: When I say sex-biased I do obviously mean gender-biased
Mod edit: Non-sex biased? I think you are adding the bias there... thank your lucky stars you find it easy.
Edit: Woo - mod edit! I feel special.
From an evolutionary perspective there is no reason for males to be at all choosey about who they have sex with since males are only limited in the number of offspring they can produce by the rate at which they can persuade females to mate with them. Females on the other hand are limited by the gestational period and by the period of parental care and so need to be more selective about whom they mate with. For this reason, men have evolved to sleep around while women have evolved to look for men that are likely to stick around and help them bring up their spawn. Thus, if you are just looking for sex it is easier to get it if you are female than if you are male. Of course the introduction of contraception has changed this somewhat, but until society changes enough so that women who sleep around are not viewed as slags then it is going to continue to be difficult for men to get their legs over.
I could go on to point out that from a Darwinian point of view the kind of chavs you see on Trisha that have 8 kids by 6 different women by the age of 22 are in fact fitter than the rest of the population who know how to use a condom, but that would just be depressing.
( , Fri 13 Apr 2007, 9:25, Reply)
« Go Back