Nah. I'm not done.
Theist: belief in a GOD.

Therefore, Dawkins, who clearly believes in the absoloute NON-existance of gods is NOT a Theist.

If however you choose to re-write the meaning of "theist" and choose to incorreclty believe that it simply means "to have a belief system", then yes - by an incorrect definition of the word - He may be considered to be a theist.

************************************

AFINKAWAN... just for you sunshine.

Rough Quote: "People who rant against religion secretly aren't sure and want confirmation/backup".

Paraphrase: "Vehemently homophobic people are actually gay". (no, They're mostly choosing to believe the Bible when it says that homosexuality is wrong)


Ok... Here's an alternative to your simplistic point of view. If you choose to liken vocal Atheists to people who lech over young girls... try this one on for size.

I contend that some people are so horrified by the concept of others finding children sexually attractive that they feel a need to make their disgust and shock heard... and in no way harbour feelings towards minors.
Similarly, Some people who find no logic to the suggestion of an omnipotent deity are so totally shocked that others choose to live with the bible as their guide though life, that they feel a need to express this, and point out things that - to them - make it blatantly clear that no god exists.

I find it interesting that Even when someone stands up, goes against the prevalent flow and makes themselves a target of hatred in rder to state their bliefs, there are STILL those who insist upon suggesting that this person is simply not sure that what they're staing is what they belive in..

What are you going to say next? "Hey, you know those suicide Bombers that claim that "Allah is Great"... They're all actually catholics looking for support"

Really... take a step back and see if you truly believe your statements make sense.
( Humpty Dumpty was Pushed Is unaware of having any limits., Tue 27 Nov 2007, 15:23, Reply)