Racist grandparents
It Came From Planet Aylia says: "My husband's mad Auntie Joan accused the man seven doors down of stealing her milk as he was the first black neighbour she had. She doesn't even get her milk delivered." Tell us about casual racism from oldies.
Thanks to Brayn Dedd who suggested this too
( , Thu 27 Oct 2011, 11:54)
It Came From Planet Aylia says: "My husband's mad Auntie Joan accused the man seven doors down of stealing her milk as he was the first black neighbour she had. She doesn't even get her milk delivered." Tell us about casual racism from oldies.
Thanks to Brayn Dedd who suggested this too
( , Thu 27 Oct 2011, 11:54)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Yes. Putting the world economy in the hands of the 'experts' was a major stunning fucking success.
Well, it was for them.
They got bonuses and bailouts and bigger yachts.
Let's do it again?
www.occupywallst.org/
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 7:50, 1 reply)
Well, it was for them.
They got bonuses and bailouts and bigger yachts.
www.occupywallst.org/
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 7:50, 1 reply)
I didn't get a bigger yacht. I feel cheated.
So we put the world economy in the hands of people that aren't experts?
Is that why the OccupyWallSt group's arguments are so unrealistic and, well, lacking in expertise?
Would you entrust your life savings to Alan Sugar or the crusties outside St Pauls? I think we both know who'd make you money and who'd not. And at the end of day, we're both talking about money. Ethics aside, everyone still wants their slice of the pie.
I can't argue against your feelings that there is unfairness in the world, and that there are thieving gits who will screw whole economies just to make a quick buck. I just don't think anyone's put forward a more *sustainable* model for a world economy. There will always be someone out there that will take advantage. What we need are more laws to restrict them. I don't think we need a system based on ethics - some people just don't have them.
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 8:24, closed)
So we put the world economy in the hands of people that aren't experts?
Is that why the OccupyWallSt group's arguments are so unrealistic and, well, lacking in expertise?
Would you entrust your life savings to Alan Sugar or the crusties outside St Pauls? I think we both know who'd make you money and who'd not. And at the end of day, we're both talking about money. Ethics aside, everyone still wants their slice of the pie.
I can't argue against your feelings that there is unfairness in the world, and that there are thieving gits who will screw whole economies just to make a quick buck. I just don't think anyone's put forward a more *sustainable* model for a world economy. There will always be someone out there that will take advantage. What we need are more laws to restrict them. I don't think we need a system based on ethics - some people just don't have them.
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 8:24, closed)
"Them" being one of the top 1% controlling the world economy?
Thanks for that. I'm off to wield some power...
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 9:58, closed)
Thanks for that. I'm off to wield some power...
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 9:58, closed)
probably a nobler way to spend your time
than arguing with a small be-boned breakfast fish on why the dinosaur ideals he is clinging to so desperately are fucking him over.
Still, different strokes, eh?
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 12:19, closed)
than arguing with a small be-boned breakfast fish on why the dinosaur ideals he is clinging to so desperately are fucking him over.
Still, different strokes, eh?
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 12:19, closed)
You do realize
That you've just called yourself the "small be-boned breakfast fish" (sic) with the dinosaur ideals.
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 13:50, closed)
That you've just called yourself the "small be-boned breakfast fish" (sic) with the dinosaur ideals.
( , Wed 2 Nov 2011, 13:50, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread