You're going to have to explain to me how that is in any way relevant.
Take your time. I'm quite clever and I work in electronics so I'll probably be able to follow it if you're patient.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 16:45, archived)

Statistically, I'll bet that you're not as clever as me.
Over here, we're about 16 standard deviations up from the average IQ, and batting in excess of 175. So there's only about 100-200 people in the UK with a higher IQ.

It's also odd how you seem to work in whatever area it is that you're currently arguing about all the time.

I suggest a basic refresher course in logic.
( Sygiinu, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:02, archived)

Hahaha.
You're honestly going to resort to a gong-waving competition rather than attempt to justify yourself? And not even real gongs ... Mensa gongs? That's weak. You can do better than that.

How about rather than attempting to patronise me, you actually answer my question? I genuinely don't understand and I'd quite like to know what you mean. (and I already have a PhD and a successful career so I probably won't take up your offer of a 'refresher course' ... thanks all the same)
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:05, archived)

hahaha a PhD means shit.
I'm not short of degrees my self, and I'll bet that I had them when I was younger than you too, given that I was the youngest physics grad ever from my university,

Additionally I work in a university too, half of the people here with PhDs couldn't form a logical argument if their life depended on it.

Edit: And if you'd like to discuss your career success I point you towards ownership of my own company, my two board appointments, and my board level consultantships to several multi-million pound turn over corporations.
( Sygiinu, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:10, archived)

GONGS! LOOK AT THOSE GONGS!
Pay no attention to the argument behind the curtain! Look at the gongs!

You've lost, sonny. Give it up.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:19, archived)

You started the gong waving by claiming to be terribly clever,
but you clearly can't compete so I'll let you back out of that one before it gets too embarrassing for you as everyone realises that you're a middle of the road average academic.

Congratulations on moving on to the the next Argument Success(TM) method of trying to make rumour equal truth though. You know you can get a book with about 10 of these in? I think you're only up to about 5 at the moment, so there's considerable scope for improvement.
( Sygiinu, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:25, archived)

No I didn't.
I did not understand your point so I asked you to clarify. You apparently couldn't answer. That was the point where the discussion finished and the floundering started. Up there. The rest of this is just me allowing you to dig yourself into a hole labelled 'loser'.

And I've had your mum. Although granted I wasn't the youngest person ever to have her.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:30, archived)

A new argument method!
Oh no, actually just a rehash of rumour equals fact.

You really are stupid, aren't you?

I couldn't careless what you think of me, as your thoughts have been demonstrated to be inaccurate and even fail to be self consistent.
( Sygiinu, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:35, archived)

I think you're probably a perfectly nice and intelligent person
who has got too involved in an argument on the internet.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:45, archived)

Another argument that isn't even self consistant with the previous ones.
But at least we're on to a new argument method now.

How many more can you think up?
( Sygiinu, Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:52, archived)