Daily Mail nicks an image again and accuses me of Google Bombing
( , Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:35, archived)
( , Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:35, archived)
Best not let on about you being black and gay, then.
I like how the only people getting upset about this are the DM, rather than you or herself.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:38,
archived)
SARS-SPREADING IMMIGRANTS?
SELLING THE SOCIALIST WORKER AND RAISING MY TAXES??
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:40,
archived)
RACIST ZOMBIE PAEDOPHILE SPREADS VICIOUS RUMOURS USING INTERNET BRAINWASHING TO KILL HAZEL BLEARS
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:41,
archived)
If I put on my Fail-O-Vision spectacles
I can see the riots. And lots of brown men ejaculating onto the faces of unsuspecting white housewives.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:42,
archived)
Oh my word.
Where are you looking with those?
I can usually just see my face looking back at me.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:44,
archived)
I can usually just see my face looking back at me.
You need wider tear ducts.
I'll lend you some specialist tweezers if you like.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:48,
archived)
If I'm going to be facially tortured
the least you could do is get an SS uniform and a convincing accent.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:49,
archived)
PVC?!
Wash your mouth out with soap, I'm not some cheap teenage goffik. If I wanted you wipeclean I'd have you in proper latex. As it stands, though, I want historical accuracy so these are originals.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:53,
archived)
Am I for fucking and ttssattssr's for punishing?
I knew I wouldn't be enough for you.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:23,
archived)
no
but it just highlights my failings in not wanting to be punished that you feel the need to punish him.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:31,
archived)
I'm all for censorship if it means the Daily Mail is silenced.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:39,
archived)
Daily Mail articles always sound like
the ramblings of an old man, they stray off topic really quickly and have 0% knowledge of youth culture
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:39,
archived)
A few years, I read a book from the 1920s that was scarily like the Daily Mail
in that it was incoherent, ill thought out and the only reason it was written was to stir shit.
The book was Mein Kampf by one A. Hitler.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:42,
archived)
The book was Mein Kampf by one A. Hitler.
Of course A Hitler is one.
It's only when you get into Hitlers that it'd be many.
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:44,
archived)
hahaha
getting 1st in search engine results like that is pure class :)
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:43,
archived)
Dickheads
don't even know what a Googlebomb is and isn't
edit: I'm still 2nd for 'john prescott'
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 14:58,
archived)
edit: I'm still 2nd for 'john prescott'
welcome back
hope you had a good break.
The give away in the Mail's article was :
"Google yesterday denied the politicians had been subjected to Google Bombing, saying the picture's ranking was due to several factors including popularity."
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:02,
archived)
The give away in the Mail's article was :
"Google yesterday denied the politicians had been subjected to Google Bombing, saying the picture's ranking was due to several factors including popularity."
Ta. Had a nice break, thanks.
Yes, saw that. Submitted the following comment, which is sure to be deleted:
"What you describe here is not a Googlebomb, but what Google regards to be relevant image result. Google themselves told you that, but you didn't listen."
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:04,
archived)
"What you describe here is not a Googlebomb, but what Google regards to be relevant image result. Google themselves told you that, but you didn't listen."
have you noticed the name of the 'journalist'?
..try google
Reading, muslims The-Sun
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:13,
archived)
Reading, muslims The-Sun
bloody hell
this 'Googlebomb' nonsense is a mere drop in her ocean of bullshit:
www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2006/10/20/so-sang-the-blithe-reporter-man/
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:18,
archived)
www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2006/10/20/so-sang-the-blithe-reporter-man/
The thing that annoys me most about that article is that
it says Google themselves have told the Daily Mail that it isn't a result of "google-bombing", and yet they still published the article all about "google-bombing".
I have commented my opinion about them in the strongest possible way, so I doubt my comment will be published ;)
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:01,
archived)
I have commented my opinion about them in the strongest possible way, so I doubt my comment will be published ;)
Interesting fact
'Google bombing' emerged in the early 90s
Google appeared only in 1998
Magic!
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:37,
archived)
Google appeared only in 1998
Magic!
they missed out the fact that unmarried pregnant teenage immigrant mothers did this.
and WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE GOVERNMENT DOING ABOUT IT?!?!?!
( ,
Tue 26 Aug 2008, 15:56,
archived)