No, really, there isn't.
i. If it's so easy to divide by 2, why do I suddenly have to divide by 14?
ii. A trader who can't afford a set of scales in this day and age is a fucking crap trader.
iii. 57g of meat per day? On yer bike grandpa.
iv. Units have nothing to do with how many people want to share a pizza.
v. Having spent my formative years computationally modelling and balancing Sea King rotor systems I can assure you I can still divide a circle into five equal parts to within ±3° by eye, so ten is not a problem.
(
joefish It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks, Tue 30 Aug 2016, 16:49,
Share,
Reply)
...the point is it all divvies up into 'nice' numbers that you can achieve with balancing scales instead of trusting someone else's weights. And you can factor Time into it as well.
Don't blame me, blame the Roman Army.
(, Tue 30 Aug 2016, 17:27, Share, Reply)
these do seem like 2000 year old problems
I cant remember the last time I saw anyone weighing stuff to sell with weights. The butcher is about the only place I get asked how much I want by weight these days
(, Tue 30 Aug 2016, 17:45, Share, Reply)
±3°? Nice way of getting an extra olive.
*edit* you're good at this then I assume?
woodgears.ca/eyeball/
(, Tue 30 Aug 2016, 17:36, Share, Reply)