
have you missed the fucking point completely?
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be 'fair use of copyrighted works' what do you think it is?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45,
archived)
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be 'fair use of copyrighted works' what do you think it is?

would i think some under "use for review" which is fair use (and...still will be?)
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:51,
archived)

Thats what all mine are from now on. EVEN THE TOAP!
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56,
archived)

In that particular case it wasn't about the screenshots being posted, I used it just to make the point that, from what I have observed people here usually have a relaxed view on copyright.
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:57,
archived)
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.

www.pirateparty.org.uk/
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:00,
archived)
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.

Are you actually saying that posting a link to the pirate part website with the comment "go get a clue" isn't implying that I agree with copyright?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:06,
archived)

when an image they made/altered is posted in some right wing nazi rag? An idea they've put out to only see it "copyrighted" by another person.
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:15,
archived)
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.

No, perhaps you should read what I have actually posted and reply to that.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:19,
archived)