have you missed the fucking point completely?
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be 'fair use of copyrighted works' what do you think it is?
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45,
archived)
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be 'fair use of copyrighted works' what do you think it is?
would i think some under "use for review" which is fair use (and...still will be?)
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:51,
archived)
Thats what all mine are from now on. EVEN THE TOAP!
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56,
archived)
In that particular case it wasn't about the screenshots being posted, I used it just to make the point that, from what I have observed people here usually have a relaxed view on copyright.
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:57,
archived)
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.
www.pirateparty.org.uk/
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:00,
archived)
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.
Are you actually saying that posting a link to the pirate part website with the comment "go get a clue" isn't implying that I agree with copyright?
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:06,
archived)
when an image they made/altered is posted in some right wing nazi rag? An idea they've put out to only see it "copyrighted" by another person.
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:15,
archived)
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.
No, perhaps you should read what I have actually posted and reply to that.
(,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:19,
archived)