
( , Thu 20 May 2010, 23:20, archived)

It would just make my shitty arse even shittier.
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:23,
archived)

it's the fact that it was stolen by the daily mail
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:24,
archived)

in the words of jay and silent bob:
I want my motherfucking movie cheque!
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:28,
archived)
I want my motherfucking movie cheque!

yet a lot would have or do have several music or film torrents on the go. But still, boo Murdoch ect ect
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:56,
archived)


I wasn't having a go at the people who did the work or saying that the people who claimed it as their own shouldn't be diciplined, I was just pointing our that for an on-line community that uses other peoples work in it's pictures about 80% of the time, it sure does seem to care about copyright when it's their work.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:21,
archived)

Your words man, you assume a lot about an internet community and people you have never met
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:32,
archived)

Actually I remember a thread in which people where discussing the release of the Wolverine torrent being early. Someone posted screen-shots, it was discussed and if I recall nobody objected the activity because of copyright.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:37,
archived)

have you missed the fucking point completely?
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be "fair use of copyrighted works" what do you think it is?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45,
archived)
People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be "fair use of copyrighted works" what do you think it is?

would i think some under "use for review" which is fair use (and...still will be?)
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:51,
archived)

Thats what all mine are from now on. EVEN THE TOAP!
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56,
archived)

In that particular case it wasn't about the screenshots being posted, I used it just to make the point that, from what I have observed people here usually have a relaxed view on copyright.
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:57,
archived)
I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.

www.pirateparty.org.uk/
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:00,
archived)
hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.

Are you actually saying that posting a link to the pirate part website with the comment "go get a clue" isn't implying that I agree with copyright?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:06,
archived)

when an image they made/altered is posted in some right wing nazi rag? An idea they've put out to only see it "copyrighted" by another person.
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:15,
archived)
I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.

No, perhaps you should read what I have actually posted and reply to that.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:19,
archived)

if the last few days on thing site have shown anything - it is that people here care a great deal more about other things and people.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 1:22,
archived)

b3ta isn't a hive mind, "someone here did x once" is not a valid reason to be whining at a different group of people now.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45,
archived)

there are a huge number of people who use b3ta, and a tiny number who had this conversation you remember having happaned once, its not one mass group who all think and do the same stuff, quoting something some b3ta member did at some point is not relevent to the people having this conversation now.
...do you even know what your point is?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56,
archived)
...do you even know what your point is?

( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58,
archived)

we don't claim that we wrote the songs or directed the films
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58,
archived)

1) The Mail added copyrights to the pictures.
2) Murdoch doesn't own the Mail you spazzer
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58,
archived)
2) Murdoch doesn't own the Mail you spazzer

I thought Associated Newspapers did, and it was reasonable assumption considering some of the stuff they produce, but still, my apologies.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:23,
archived)

You didn't mean "etc" did you?
Edit: Was that an edit I saw you do there?
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:26,
archived)
Edit: Was that an edit I saw you do there?

yes and I was about to thank you for spotting that, but I had to respond to someone else's post before his attention span ran out.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:32,
archived)

you are a person who doesn't do anything creative and cannot understand why his comments have missed the mark so much.
Just look at the pictures and shhh,
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:35,
archived)
Just look at the pictures and shhh,

'who hasn't done anything creative in the past few months on /board but still lurks enough to make observations'
would be more accurate.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:46,
archived)
would be more accurate.

OH? oh, that point has been made :P
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:04,
archived)

I wasn't trying to be self righteous, I haven't even posted anything in the past month.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:33,
archived)

I buy a hard copy of music I want so I have an automatic back up for when the HDD it's on fucks up. As for films? Fuck me there hasn't been one worth watching since... I can't fucking remember.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 15:49,
archived)

Is Tim Stewart a plagiaroist? I thought it would be wrong to say that Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist because he's stolen images and not text; but if it doesn't mean that Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist? what does it mean???
I don't understand how google bombs work. Does anyone else know if Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist? Please help.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:16,
archived)
I don't understand how google bombs work. Does anyone else know if Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist? Please help.

also Tim Stewart the thief.
Tim Stewart must be a plagarist then, as his published plagarism has been published.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:27,
archived)
Tim Stewart must be a plagarist then, as his published plagarism has been published.

but you maybe talking about Tim Stewart who is a plagarist. I've not met Tim Stewart the plagarist or Tim Stewart the thief So I cannot comment.
I just dont know if putting your copyright mark on a picture you didn't make would make Tim Stewart a thief or make Tim Stewart a plagarist.
Until I find out I will not be calling him either.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:41,
archived)
I just dont know if putting your copyright mark on a picture you didn't make would make Tim Stewart a thief or make Tim Stewart a plagarist.
Until I find out I will not be calling him either.

I'm sure it's perfectly legal to take an image you found, put a copyright of yourself on it and then sell it.
like what tim stewart the plagarist or tim stewart the thief might do if tim stewart is a plagarist or tim stewart is a thief.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:44,
archived)
like what tim stewart the plagarist or tim stewart the thief might do if tim stewart is a plagarist or tim stewart is a thief.

To be honest I don't even think tim stewart is a plagarist or tim stewart is a theif.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:58,
archived)


Mine now. Fuck you. All mine cos it says so on the picture.
In all honesty, people just need to start sending them invoices along with screengrabs. They won't pay, but the accounts dept will start getting pissed off and they'll put a stop to it...
Publisher, Mail Online – Martin Clarke
Managing Director, Mail Online – James Bromley
Start bugging these guys...


DAILY NEWSPAPER OF THE YEAR 70p

well, shits on it at least. he's been curled up more recently, maybe it's making him depressed at what utter cunts they are.
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:34,
archived)

the daily mail is very thick
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:39,
archived)

the snake isn't reading it, it's shitting on it, which is all it's good for
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:53,
archived)

My 10¢, it's worth writing to them and letting them know what they've done wrong and what you'd like them to do about it.
I also think it's worth being as friendly as you can about it. People on here including myself have had partial success with that approach.
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:38,
archived)
I also think it's worth being as friendly as you can about it. People on here including myself have had partial success with that approach.

Publisher, Mail Online – Martin Clarke
Managing Director, Mail Online – James Bromley
These are the guys people probably need to start bugging...
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:42,
archived)
Managing Director, Mail Online – James Bromley
These are the guys people probably need to start bugging...

that seems like a good call.
I'm not after them for money or anything, I just want them to know that stealing and then attempting to copyright other people's work is
a) immoral and b) criminal...
edit: d'oh, sorry, my post sounds really self righteous...
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:45,
archived)
I'm not after them for money or anything, I just want them to know that stealing and then attempting to copyright other people's work is
a) immoral and b) criminal...
edit: d'oh, sorry, my post sounds really self righteous...

edit: No, it sounds like you're angry, and justifiably so.

quite likes b3ta maybe they would like to say a word or two about the Mail's behaviour.
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:46,
archived)

journalisted.com/tim-stewart#tab-work
and register themselves as Tim, and fill in the missing Biography section.
( ,
Thu 20 May 2010, 23:48,
archived)
and register themselves as Tim, and fill in the missing Biography section.

And I can't. Yes, I have tried googling. Somebody really needs to find one of him for the next challenge.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:08,
archived)

for image theft
Should be a laugh
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:16,
archived)
Should be a laugh

www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2010/03/31/uk-government-tightens-website-blocking-bill-via-new-draft-clause-18.html
I must write to my ISP and tell them a site is ripping of other peoples work.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:25,
archived)
I must write to my ISP and tell them a site is ripping of other peoples work.

I wonder what it would take for "TIM STEWART IS A THIEF" to be the only google search result for tim stewart (who is a thief).
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:25,
archived)

It is already the number 1!
Edit: for Tim Stewart is a thief
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:37,
archived)
Edit: for Tim Stewart is a thief

having googled him already the only people who come up now are utterly unrelated tim stewarts (a wedding photographer and a golfer being the top two).
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:42,
archived)

He works for The Daily Mail. All excitement, apart from that about immigrants, ends there.
( ,
Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56,
archived)