b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10058540 (Thread)

# because: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280010/Olympic-mascots-Wenlock-Mandeville-internet-viral-treatment.html


I know i'm by no means the first person this has happened to,
but the fact that they've 'copyrighted' the images has really pissed me off...

hey ho.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:20, archived)
# I wouldn't wipe my arse with the Daily Mail.
It would just make my shitty arse even shittier.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:23, archived)
# It puts more shit on than it removes.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:31, archived)
# it's not the fact that it was stolen
it's the fact that it was stolen by the daily mail
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:24, archived)
# ^ THIS
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:26, archived)
# yea, that's the worst part.
in the words of jay and silent bob:

I want my motherfucking movie cheque!
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:28, archived)
# were you attacked by mark hamill in a bad guy suit?
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:30, archived)
# ohhh Cock-Knocker
 
I must watch that again
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:40, archived)
# haven't watched it for ages
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:41, archived)
# I'm loving how everyone here is getting pissed at the daily mail for 'stealing' their work
yet a lot would have or do have several music or film torrents on the go. But still, boo Murdoch ect ect
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:56, archived)
# Yeah, but I don't slap a copyright symbol on fucking KICK ASS and claim it as my own.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58, archived)
#
I wasn't having a go at the people who did the work or saying that the people who claimed it as their own shouldn't be diciplined, I was just pointing our that for an on-line community that uses other peoples work in it's pictures about 80% of the time, it sure does seem to care about copyright when it's their work.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:21, archived)
# "yet a lot would have or do have several music or film torrents on the go."
Your words man, you assume a lot about an internet community and people you have never met
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:32, archived)
#
Actually I remember a thread in which people where discussing the release of the Wolverine torrent being early. Someone posted screen-shots, it was discussed and if I recall nobody objected the activity because of copyright.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:37, archived)
# No one here slapped their own name on it and called it their own.
have you missed the fucking point completely?

People here get pictures change and animate them. It used to be "fair use of copyrighted works" what do you think it is?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45, archived)
# screenshots aiding a descussion
would i think some under "use for review" which is fair use (and...still will be?)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:51, archived)
# "screenshots aiding a descussion"
Thats what all mine are from now on. EVEN THE TOAP!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56, archived)
#
In that particular case it wasn't about the screenshots being posted, I used it just to make the point that, from what I have observed people here usually have a relaxed view on copyright.

I probably need some sleep now but I hope I didn't cause too many misunderstandings, g'night.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:57, archived)
# go get a clue
www.pirateparty.org.uk/


hope they don't copyright a cancer drug I hope you never need.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:00, archived)
#
Never said I agreed with intellectual property.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:02, archived)
# and i never said you did.
goodnight.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:03, archived)
# I can wait.
Are you actually saying that posting a link to the pirate part website with the comment "go get a clue" isn't implying that I agree with copyright?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:06, archived)
# are you implying that everyone here downloads stuff and has no right to get pissed off
when an image they made/altered is posted in some right wing nazi rag? An idea they've put out to only see it "copyrighted" by another person.

I don't care what you agree with. I don't agree with the things you've been posting.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:15, archived)
#
No, perhaps you should read what I have actually posted and reply to that.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:19, archived)
# people only care about stuff when its theirs.
if the last few days on thing site have shown anything - it is that people here care a great deal more about other things and people.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:22, archived)
# may you dream
of having a better argument
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:00, archived)
# lol
b3ta isn't a hive mind, "someone here did x once" is not a valid reason to be whining at a different group of people now.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:45, archived)
#
I though people usually stay on b3ta for a couple of years.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:52, archived)
# and?
there are a huge number of people who use b3ta, and a tiny number who had this conversation you remember having happaned once, its not one mass group who all think and do the same stuff, quoting something some b3ta member did at some point is not relevent to the people having this conversation now.

...do you even know what your point is?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56, archived)
# Um, we're not claiming it as our own work and making money off it.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58, archived)
# at least
we don't claim that we wrote the songs or directed the films
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58, archived)
# 2 things
1) The Mail added copyrights to the pictures.

2) Murdoch doesn't own the Mail you spazzer
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:58, archived)
#
I thought Associated Newspapers did, and it was reasonable assumption considering some of the stuff they produce, but still, my apologies.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:23, archived)
# how in any way
does this make sense?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:03, archived)
# I know, right?
"ect ect" what the fuck is that noise?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:07, archived)
#
lmgtfy.com/?q=etc

The second link.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:25, archived)
# Electroconvulsive therapy?
You didn't mean "etc" did you?

Edit: Was that an edit I saw you do there?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:26, archived)
#
yes and I was about to thank you for spotting that, but I had to respond to someone else's post before his attention span ran out.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:32, archived)
# I can do that too.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:28, archived)
# Oh it's you again,
go away.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:30, archived)
# ohh get you.
you are a person who doesn't do anything creative and cannot understand why his comments have missed the mark so much.

Just look at the pictures and shhh,
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:35, archived)
#
'who hasn't done anything creative in the past few months on /board but still lurks enough to make observations'
would be more accurate.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:46, archived)
# yeah, but at least we aren't.....
OH? oh, that point has been made :P
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:04, archived)
# To sum up then
You are as dumb as a fucking stick!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:11, archived)
# To sum up then
Your posted has added nothing.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:27, archived)
# same as this one http://www.b3ta.com/board/10058628
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:31, archived)
# SELF RIGHTEOUS CARD: DECLINED, PLEASE RESUBMIT
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:20, archived)
#
I wasn't trying to be self righteous, I haven't even posted anything in the past month.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:33, archived)
# weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
NOES OH
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:34, archived)
#
hurr
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:38, archived)
# :D
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:40, archived)
# Nope, no music or film torrents on the go here.
I buy a hard copy of music I want so I have an automatic back up for when the HDD it's on fucks up. As for films? Fuck me there hasn't been one worth watching since... I can't fucking remember.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 15:49, archived)
# Whos Tim Stewart?
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:28, archived)
# some thieving cunt
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:29, archived)
#
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:30, archived)
#
What a cunt. can we burn him please?
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:36, archived)
# Professional Cunt
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:43, archived)
# I think this might be him...
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:46, archived)
# If so
He is a particularly shit journalist
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:01, archived)
# Does it count as plagiarism?
Is Tim Stewart a plagiaroist? I thought it would be wrong to say that Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist because he's stolen images and not text; but if it doesn't mean that Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist? what does it mean???

I don't understand how google bombs work. Does anyone else know if Tim Stewart is a plagiaroist? Please help.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:16, archived)
# you mean Tim Stewart the plagarist? who stole other peoples images and put his name on him
also Tim Stewart the thief.

Tim Stewart must be a plagarist then, as his published plagarism has been published.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:27, archived)
# There is a thief called Tim Stewart in the world.
but you maybe talking about Tim Stewart who is a plagarist. I've not met Tim Stewart the plagarist or Tim Stewart the thief So I cannot comment.
I just dont know if putting your copyright mark on a picture you didn't make would make Tim Stewart a thief or make Tim Stewart a plagarist.
Until I find out I will not be calling him either.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:41, archived)
# No I wouldn't call him either, incase there is a legal result for calling tim stewart a plagarist or calling tim stewart a theif.
I'm sure it's perfectly legal to take an image you found, put a copyright of yourself on it and then sell it.

like what tim stewart the plagarist or tim stewart the thief might do if tim stewart is a plagarist or tim stewart is a thief.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:44, archived)
# Im not even sure what I've been typing,
To be honest I don't even think tim stewart is a plagarist or tim stewart is a theif.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:58, archived)
# Is this how it works?


Mine now. Fuck you. All mine cos it says so on the picture.


In all honesty, people just need to start sending them invoices along with screengrabs. They won't pay, but the accounts dept will start getting pissed off and they'll put a stop to it...

Publisher, Mail Online – Martin Clarke
Managing Director, Mail Online – James Bromley

Start bugging these guys...
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:29, archived)
# I don't know if you can see it but the logo is a dead horse and the URL is meatspin.com
 

 
DAILY NEWSPAPER OF THE YEAR 70p
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:38, archived)
# my snake reads the daily mail
well, shits on it at least. he's been curled up more recently, maybe it's making him depressed at what utter cunts they are.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:34, archived)
# haha
i hope you didn't actually buy it to put in his cage!
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:35, archived)
# i buy the thickest newspaper so i can cover the sides a little
the daily mail is very thick
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:39, archived)
# so are its readers
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:43, archived)
# Hey, that's snakist!
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:51, archived)
# no it's not
the snake isn't reading it, it's shitting on it, which is all it's good for
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:53, archived)
# hahaha
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:46, archived)
# Nicely done.
Especaially the s ;)
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:36, archived)
# Yeah, the copyright is adding insult to injury.
My 10¢, it's worth writing to them and letting them know what they've done wrong and what you'd like them to do about it.
I also think it's worth being as friendly as you can about it. People on here including myself have had partial success with that approach.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:38, archived)
# As I just edited on my post up there^
Publisher, Mail Online – Martin Clarke
Managing Director, Mail Online – James Bromley

These are the guys people probably need to start bugging...
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:42, archived)
# cheers
that seems like a good call.
I'm not after them for money or anything, I just want them to know that stealing and then attempting to copyright other people's work is
a) immoral and b) criminal...

edit: d'oh, sorry, my post sounds really self righteous...
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:45, archived)
# Good luck :)

edit: No, it sounds like you're angry, and justifiably so.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:09, archived)
# as the guardian
quite likes b3ta maybe they would like to say a word or two about the Mail's behaviour.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:46, archived)
# Someone could always go on here
journalisted.com/tim-stewart#tab-work
and register themselves as Tim, and fill in the missing Biography section.
(, Thu 20 May 2010, 23:48, archived)
# Bastards, I feel all dirty now!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:05, archived)
# I've tried to find a picture of this man
And I can't. Yes, I have tried googling. Somebody really needs to find one of him for the next challenge.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:08, archived)
# Mate of mine is about to send an invoice to my employer for £500
for image theft

Should be a laugh
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:16, archived)
# Sadly the "new" Draft Clause 18 (Download .PDF) replacement still aims to block copyright infringing websites
www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2010/03/31/uk-government-tightens-website-blocking-bill-via-new-draft-clause-18.html

I must write to my ISP and tell them a site is ripping of other peoples work.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:25, archived)
# the last time a daily fail person pulled a stupid on the internet it didn't go so well for them
I wonder what it would take for "TIM STEWART IS A THIEF" to be the only google search result for tim stewart (who is a thief).
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:25, archived)
# hahaha!
It is already the number 1!

Edit: for Tim Stewart is a thief
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:37, archived)
# unfortunately
having googled him already the only people who come up now are utterly unrelated tim stewarts (a wedding photographer and a golfer being the top two).
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:42, archived)
# He leads an exciting triple-life

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:52, archived)
# No
He works for The Daily Mail. All excitement, apart from that about immigrants, ends there.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 0:56, archived)
# I like the fact...
...that he put his little "copyright" message on all the b3ta images except the one that he thought might get him fatwa'd.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:12, archived)
# It's because he's a cunt.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 1:16, archived)
# Interesting...
This morning the "Tim Stewart" credit has been replaced with the b3ta usernames, and the one that would get them beheaded has been removed.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 10:42, archived)