Fair enough.Could you perhaps explain the difference between a bad SEO and a good SEO and how one would go about telling the difference. What questions should they be asked to prove their skill base?
(
monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:13,
archived)
As an employer of (currently) 23 SEOsNo, haven't got a clue. I take 'em as grads and keep the good ones. Sorry.
(
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:13,
archived)
Also,feel free to hire me and my team ;)
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:22,
archived)
You're beatingRhys and his mystery men (a few posts down) in my opinion, anyway!
( monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:24,
archived)
Milt comes across as very good to me.I'm really very expensive, so unless you are huge, maybe you should hire him?
That said, if he is as good as he sounds then maybe he is very expensive too?
(That said, if he is as good as he sounds then maybe he is very expensive too?
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:54,
archived)
You must have some wayof differentiating between good and bad?
Do they do more than link building? Do they do proper marketing to get real links to the sites, for example?
(Do they do more than link building? Do they do proper marketing to get real links to the sites, for example?
monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:23,
archived)
Technical SEO is a skillhow good someone is is borne out from their work, just as being able to code is a very minor part of programming.
Assessing someone's vision and understanding cannot really be done in an interview.
(Assessing someone's vision and understanding cannot really be done in an interview.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 17:53,
archived)