b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10101185 (Thread)

#
'When you read a blog post, do you remember the adverts around the side?'

That depends on the blog. And who says the ad has to be around the blog? Anchor text links in the blog text itself can be very tempting to the reader if done right.

'I can see people linking to your site if someone asks a question you have already answered on another part of the internet, which, fair enough is actually ethical link building (a rare thing).'

You'd be surprised how much effort goes into 'ethical' link building, and this usually results in the best links - relevant, freely given and often likely to result in actual traffic from the link.

'However, I'm sure most users searching for a question aren't going to stay and look around when they've got their answer.'

Most won't, some will. Most won't link to it, some will.

'Do you trace people's clicks from the blog to see how many people click through to the main site.'

If we're managing the blog for the client, then yes, absolutely!

'edit: examples are the best way of proving a point, so if you could find some, that would be good'

Here's one, shows how it can work for a fairly small, niche online business, www.kapow-toys.com/. It's nothing to do with me by the way, but I can totally see how it'd be benefit them. They have a blog at kapowtoys.blogspot.com/ (shame it's not self hosted as it's attracted a couple of links, but as I say, nothing to do with me!) and a Twitter account at twitter.com/Kapow_Toys/, with over 800 followers, many of whom seem to be real people.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 9:54, archived)
# .
Might be a nice blog, but unfortunately, it's recieved no inbound links, and no comments.

They are following 1,944 people. How many of the 857 are not just auto-follows. How would you test that?

They have had no re-tweets which means that even with over 800 people, when you tweet, surely it's a very small amount who actually see it (who are viewing the feed for the few seconds).

Also, their posts all seem to be marketing based, so why would someone follow it - it's like asking for spam.

I think if they were sold twitter, then they were failed by not being told to use it as a friendly voice for customers to interact with, rather than a place to post adverts.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 10:07, archived)
#
I had a quick flick through the followers... obviously some are auto follows, but you quickly get a nose for those that aren't. Lets say that even three quarters of them are auto followers, that's still over 200 people that have opted to recieve a real time feed from that store on the products they're selling. If they're regular buyers, that could make a signficant impact.

The blog HAS recieved links - here's one right here! www.transformersanimated.com/news/9407/Further+confirmation+of+Japanese+released+including+images+of+Rodimus. And seriously, like I've said before, don't worry too much about comments. Do you really want to comment on *everything* you read online?

Why would someone follow it? Same reason you might ask for an email newsletter - you're actually interested in the store and their products.

I can't account for the way either the blog or the twitter feed is run and I agree it could be done better... doesn't make it a waste of time or money though. That's assuming he's even spending money on it - he may be doing it off his own back, which would explain the oversights.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 10:19, archived)
# .
"Why would someone follow it? Same reason you might ask for an email newsletter - you're actually interested in the store and their products."

Well, I'm not one to follow advertising advertising newsletters either, so I'd probably ask the same about them.

I know some people do (though often it's through forgetting to check the box that says not to).

Which companies' tweets do you yourself enjoy recieving?
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 10:50, archived)
#
So you'd advise websites stop sending email newsletters too?

Thankfully everybody likes using the internet differently.

Off the top of my head, IDW publishing, I enjoy their comics and want to know when they have new ones out.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 10:58, archived)
# Okay, I'll concede that
entertainment is an area that twitter can actually sell product.

But what about duller products such as Double Glazing?

Do you really think that such companies could benefit from twitter?

You might have a decent approach to who you sell to, but do you not think that there are many people who are getting sold twitter and a blog who really do not need it?
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:08, archived)
#
As I say, it's hard to judge the "need" of any online promotion. It is what you make of it. Double glazing you say? renegadeconservatoryguy.co.uk/

Mind you, that same guy says he thinks Twitter is a waste of time, although he links through to his facebook. As I say, it's what you make of it.

I'll concede that there are doubtless cowboy companies indiscriminately selling blogs to people that they're probably confident will be of no benefit to them. Just try not to tar us all with the same brush. Besides, it's not like cowboy web developers are in short supply.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:34, archived)
# Fair enough.
Although his blog does seem a success because he wants to write.
There's no sales-talk on it, just things he finds interesting.

Which was a point I think I made earlier - the only successful blogs are ones which are written by someone with a love of writing.

A businessman forced to write something is not going to be read.

It's usually hard enough to get clients to sit down and write normal content for a website, they have better things to be doing - so writing a blog is going to be a chore to most.

(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:54, archived)
#
True, but do you think the idea was originally his or that of Motionlab Marketing, linked to from the footer?

This is what I mean - if a businessman buys a blog and then writes nothing worth reading, who's fault is it really, when you can see right there that it can work so long as you put the effort in, even for something as tedious as double glazing? Should the company they're dealing with refuse to set them up the blog, or refrain from mentioning it as a possibility, because they don't think the client is interesting enough to sustain it?
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 12:04, archived)
# .
"Should the company they're dealing with refuse to set them up the blog, or refrain from mentioning it as a possibility, because they don't think the client is interesting enough to sustain it?"

They should ask him whether he thinks that he has the time and desire to write decent content, they should then help guide him in his articles to avoid him going down the sales talk route.

I may be wrong, but this does not seem to happen very often. Most corporate blogs I stumble across have nothing to them. There is no guidance there, and they are scared of offering opinion through fear of damaging brand.
(, Thu 24 Jun 2010, 12:13, archived)