![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Richard Littlejohn"){kind=small}
I would call the balloon a cunt (or a cloaca),but perhaps it would be more effective for me to give a reasoned argument as to why I dislike balloons and why I don't agree with anything they stand for. I would refer to evidence contrary to the standpoint of balloons, employing my intellect to perhaps sway fans of balloons that I am perhaps most likely to be correct, and that balloons are wrong. Through reasoned, supported arguments against balloons, a situation would arise at which balloons would find it difficult to defend themselves and this may cause balloons to lose support, temper their balloonishness, or explode in rage. If I were to simply call the balloon a 'cunt', or similar, then the balloon could cry about being bullied by internet people, look like a victim, the fans of the balloon would be equally outraged and defensive, then everything would be forgotten about, the balloons having successfully defended themselves and moved on.
From the Richard Littlejohn challenge. See all 130 entries (closed)
(
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:17,
archived)